Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7611–7620

NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

Well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach a conclusion on prong two and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence and articulate the basis for any finding on whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance his endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a conclusion on prong two and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence and articulate the basis for any finding on whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance his endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_07_B5203; source_row=33232
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Exceptional ability classification

What the decision said

AAO reserved this issue because the petition fails on NIW grounds, making it unnecessary to reach the exceptional ability classification question.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because the petition fails on NIW grounds, making it unnecessary to reach the exceptional ability classification question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_04_B5203; source_row=33212
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

Ten years full-time experience (employer letters)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The personal accountant's letter is not a letter from an employer as required. Colleague letters lacked dates of employment and confirmation of full-time status. The record therefore does not establish ten years of full-time experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The personal accountant's letter is not a letter from an employer as required. Colleague letters lacked dates of employment and confirmation of full-time status. The record therefore does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_01_B5203; source_row=33197
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

recognition

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters and training certificates demonstrated the Petitioner's work ethic and continued professional development, but did not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters and training certificates demonstrated the Petitioner's work ethic and continued professional development, but did not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_01_B5203; source_row=33201
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

academic record

Official academic record (degree/diploma/certificate)

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner submitted her diploma and academic transcripts for a bachelor of accounting sciences, establishing she meets this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted her diploma and academic transcripts for a bachelor of accounting sciences, establishing she meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_01_B5203; source_row=33196
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

license or certification

License to practice or certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The identity card merely identifies the Petitioner as an accountant registered with a regional council; it does not constitute a license to practice the profession or a certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The identity card merely identifies the Petitioner as an accountant registered with a regional council; it does not constitute a license to practice the profession or a certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_01_B5203; source_row=33198
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

The submitted employer letters together demonstrated only six years and two months of full-time experience in the occupation, which is less than the ten years required. An employment certificate from a third employer did not specify work duties or confirm full-time status. A letter from a post-filing employer could not be used to establish eligibility at the time of filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The submitted employer letters together demonstrated only six years and two months of full-time experience in the occupation, which is less than the ten years required. An employment certificate from a third employer did not specify work duties or confirm full-time status. A letter from a post-filing employer could not be used to establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=33220
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

academic record

official academic record

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner submitted a certificate of academic knowledge as an airplane line technician and academic transcripts, which established the criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted a certificate of academic knowledge as an airplane line technician and academic transcripts, which established the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=33219
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters and certificates showed work experience, training, and praise from employers and co-workers, but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters and certificates showed work experience, training, and praise from employers and co-workers, but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=33224
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license to practice the profession or certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner submitted two licenses from the Colombian civil aeronautics authority, which established the criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted two licenses from the Colombian civil aeronautics authority, which established the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-15_06_B5203; source_row=33221
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment