Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7631–7640
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The government-agency evidence submitted is credible and establishes the merit of cybersecurity risk management as a field, but it addresses the industry generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The government-agency evidence submitted is credible and establishes the merit of cybersecurity risk management as a field, but it addresses the industry generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The Petitioner provided no business plan, no explanation of what distinguishes her methodology from other models, and no specific plan for disseminating her approach at scale; thus she did not demonstrate that her endeavor would have a broad impact beyond individual clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_03_B5203; source_row=33192 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the third Dhanasar prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_03_B5203; source_row=33194 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the second Dhanasar prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved its opinion on the second Dhanasar prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_03_B5203; source_row=33193 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence confirmed the Petitioner's sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field, based on AI/autonomous vehicle contributions, venture capital investment, selective organizational memberships, and expert endorsements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence confirmed the Petitioner's sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field, based on AI/autonomous vehicle contributions, venture capital investment, selective organizational memberships, and expert endorsements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=33184 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated leading and critical roles at distinguished technology companies through letters of endorsement and articles, reversing the Director's denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner demonstrated leading and critical roles at distinguished technology companies through letters of endorsement and articles, reversing the Director's denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=33182 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that endorsement letters, patent applications, and articles demonstrated the Petitioner's original contributions of major significance in natural language processing technology and AI, reversing the Director's denial.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that endorsement letters, patent applications, and articles demonstrated the Petitioner's original contributions of major significance in natural language processing technology and AI, reversing the Director's denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=33181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO found that the record established published material about the Petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found that the record established published material about the Petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_01_B2203; source_row=33180 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
On balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Director's determination on prong three was in error because the Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations or address the Petitioner's specific claims regarding this prong.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's determination on prong three was in error because the Director did not discuss the evidence weighed in balancing the considerations or address the Petitioner's specific claims regarding this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_02_B5203; source_row=33191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Member of the professions holding an advanced degree
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director incorrectly identified the Petitioner's occupation as fitness trainer; the Petitioner intends to work as general manager of a business in corporate wellness, sports marketing, and sports coaching, an occupation for which a bachelor's degree or its equivalent is the minimum requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director incorrectly identified the Petitioner's occupation as fitness trainer; the Petitioner intends to work as general manager of a business in corporate wellness, sports marketing, and sports coaching, an occupation for which a bachelor's degree or its equivalent is the minimum requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-14_02_B5203; source_row=33187 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c