Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7721–7730

NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award from a learning institution

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the course certificates and training records from flight schools relate to the Petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability and satisfy the plain language of the regulation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the course certificates and training records from flight schools relate to the Petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability and satisfy the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-01_01_B5203; source_row=33053
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

exceptional ability final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO faulted the Director for failing to conduct or articulate a proper final merits determination addressing the totality of the evidence and remanded for a new decision.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO faulted the Director for failing to conduct or articulate a proper final merits determination addressing the totality of the evidence and remanded for a new decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-01_01_B5203; source_row=33056
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's proposed endeavor was neither specific nor consistent, changing materially at each stage of proceedings. Material changes to a petition are not permissible, and generalized conclusory statements without specific impact evidence lack probative value. The record does not show national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's proposed endeavor was neither specific nor consistent, changing materially at each stage of proceedings. Material changes to a petition are not permissible, and generalized conclusory statements without specific impact evidence lack probative value. The record does not show national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-31_02_B5203; source_row=33043
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance: the opinion letter and reference letters fail to address the specific endeavor's broader implications, and the business plan's revenue/staffing projections do not show substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. job creation.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance: the opinion letter and reference letters fail to address the specific endeavor's broader implications, and the business plan's revenue/staffing projections do not show substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. job creation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-31_03_B5203; source_row=33046
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

Why the evidence was persuasive

The regulatory definition of 'advanced degree' encompasses 'any' foreign equivalent degree above baccalaureate, without requiring that the degree be in the same field as the proposed endeavor. The Petitioner's master's in higher education therefore qualifies.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The regulatory definition of 'advanced degree' encompasses 'any' foreign equivalent degree above baccalaureate, without requiring that the degree be in the same field as the proposed endeavor. The Petitioner's master's in higher education therefore qualifies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-31_02_B5203; source_row=33042
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

New appeal evidence was not considered because the Petitioner failed to submit it in response to the RFE. Even if considered, 10 cumulative citations and indirect citation logic are insufficient; access counts without comparative data or citation evidence do not demonstrate major significance; and the peer-reviewed article was not the Petitioner's own original contribution.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
New appeal evidence was not considered because the Petitioner failed to submit it in response to the RFE. Even if considered, 10 cumulative citations and indirect citation logic are insufficient; access counts without comparative data or citation evidence do not demonstrate major significance; and the peer-reviewed article was not the Petitioner's own original contribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=33036
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The invitation to a seminar does not constitute an award or prize, and the only documented 'award' was an NSF grant to a university to support unnamed American scientists — not an award to the Petitioner personally. The NII News publication lacked a required English translation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The invitation to a seminar does not constitute an award or prize, and the only documented 'award' was an NSF grant to a university to support unnamed American scientists — not an award to the Petitioner personally. The NII News publication lacked a required English translation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=33034
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner relied on academic achievements and association memberships rather than demonstrating a leading or critical role. The HR letter from his employer lacked sufficient detail, and no evidence of distinguished reputation was provided for his employer. His IEEE membership post-dated the petition filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner relied on academic achievements and association memberships rather than demonstrating a leading or critical role. The HR letter from his employer lacked sufficient detail, and no evidence of distinguished reputation was provided for his employer. His IEEE membership post-dated the petition filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=33038
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO disagreed with the Director and found the submitted evidence sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated as a judge of others' work in the same or allied field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director and found the submitted evidence sufficient to establish that the Petitioner participated as a judge of others' work in the same or allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=33035
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not establish the required acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate the record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=33041
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment