Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's own arguments undermined the choreographer comparison by conceding that his responsibilities extended well beyond choreography, and he failed to establish that his combination of duties is unique or that no more comparable occupational category exists.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own arguments undermined the choreographer comparison by conceding that his responsibilities extended well beyond choreography, and he failed to establish that his combination of duties is unique or that no more comparable occupational category exists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-15_01_B2203; source_row=44101 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On balance, waiver beneficial to the United States
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that despite the Petitioner having an advanced STEM degree and being well-positioned, he failed to show it would be impractical to secure a job offer or labor certification, and did not demonstrate sufficient urgency in the national interest to warrant forgoing the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that despite the Petitioner having an advanced STEM degree and being well-positioned, he failed to show it would be impractical to secure a job offer or labor certification, and did not demonstrate sufficient urgency in the national interest to warrant forgoing the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-14_01_B5203; source_row=44084 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic EngineeringEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the endeavor had substantial merit (science, business, technology), the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The Petitioner's work appeared confined to one employer with no credible projections of broader impact, and recommendation letters made wide-ranging but conclusory claims without explaining the national-scale mechanism.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the endeavor had substantial merit (science, business, technology), the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The Petitioner's work appeared confined to one employer with no credible projections of broader impact, and recommendation letters made wide-ranging but conclusory claims without explaining the national-scale mechanism. The endeavor did not credibly show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or have substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-14_02_B5203; source_row=44092 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination because the Petitioner judged employees of his own company and did not establish that those personnel were in the same or an allied field of general and operations managers.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable determination because the Petitioner judged employees of his own company and did not establish that those personnel were in the same or an allied field of general and operations managers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-14_01_B2203; source_row=44074 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any accolade was nationally or internationally recognized or awarded for excellence in the field. National and international recognition flows from awareness of the accolade in the field, not merely from the reputation of the issuing entity.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to demonstrate that any accolade was nationally or internationally recognized or awarded for excellence in the field. National and international recognition flows from awareness of the accolade in the field, not merely from the reputation of the issuing entity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-14_01_B2203; source_row=44075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letter provided only general statements about the Petitioner's contributions and did not detail his specific original contributions or their significance to the field.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letter provided only general statements about the Petitioner's contributions and did not detail his specific original contributions or their significance to the field. The articles and documents about Doctor CV did not discuss the Petitioner's original work or its significance; his contributions were limited to helping develop Doctor CV rather than making contributions to the broader field of education technology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-14_02_B2203; source_row=44087 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c