Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Five years of full-time post-baccalaureate progressive experience in the specialty
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer letters documented years of employment and duties but did not indicate full-time work, so the petitioner failed to demonstrate the required five years of full-time post-baccalaureate experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letters documented years of employment and duties but did not indicate full-time work, so the petitioner failed to demonstrate the required five years of full-time post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_06_B5203; source_row=32911 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters attested to the petitioner's taekwondo competencies and teaching capabilities but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters attested to the petitioner's taekwondo competencies and teaching capabilities but did not demonstrate recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_06_B5203; source_row=32916 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's degree is in law, which does not relate to her area of exceptional ability (taekwondo/self-defense instruction), so the criterion is not satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's degree is in law, which does not relate to her area of exceptional ability (taekwondo/self-defense instruction), so the criterion is not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_06_B5203; source_row=32912 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesFaculty
Issue evaluated
license or certification
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The black belt cards were not accompanied by additional evidence or explanation of how they qualify as a license or certification to practice her profession as a taekwondo and self-defense instructor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The black belt cards were not accompanied by additional evidence or explanation of how they qualify as a license or certification to practice her profession as a taekwondo and self-defense instructor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_06_B5203; source_row=32914 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not explicitly revisit this criterion at step 1 but implicitly affirmed the Director's finding by proceeding under the alternative criteria analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not explicitly revisit this criterion at step 1 but implicitly affirmed the Director's finding by proceeding under the alternative criteria analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=32885 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien
What the decision said
AAO disagreed with the Director that the published material criterion was met, and reserved consideration of this evidence for the final merits determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director that the published material criterion was met, and reserved consideration of this evidence for the final merits determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=32887 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. The Jury Prize lacked demonstrated prestige within the acting field; media coverage was insufficient (articles lacking authors, lacking evidence of circulation, or not focused on acting); judging was limited to one confirmed instance; recommendation letters used identical language suggesting they were not independently authored; and the Petitioner's multilingual attributes rather t…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. The Jury Prize lacked demonstrated prestige within the acting field; media coverage was insufficient (articles lacking authors, lacking evidence of circulation, or not focused on acting); judging was limited to one confirmed instance; recommendation letters used identical language suggesting they were not independently authored; and the Petitioner's multilingual attributes rather than acclaimed acting talent explained his commercial hirings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=32892 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification to practice the profession
Why AAO was not persuaded
The English translation of the professional statement lacked the required certification of competence and contained translation errors. Even if properly certified, the professional statement was insufficient without documentary evidence from the Federal Council of Administration confirming licensure. Foreign language certificates lacked full English translations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The English translation of the professional statement lacked the required certification of competence and contained translation errors. Even if properly certified, the professional statement was insufficient without documentary evidence from the Federal Council of Administration confirming licensure. Foreign language certificates lacked full English translations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_07_B5203; source_row=32922 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter and certificate demonstrated only that the Petitioner's employer valued his services. They did not show that his contributions had an impact beyond his employer at an industry or field level.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter and certificate demonstrated only that the Petitioner's employer valued his services. They did not show that his contributions had an impact beyond his employer at an industry or field level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-18_07_B5203; source_row=32923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c