Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7881–7890
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the failure to satisfy the first prong.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the failure to satisfy the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-13_03_B5203; source_row=32811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show broader implications in the quick service restaurant industry or business/financial services field. Job creation and revenue projections lacked supporting detail, and importance of the industry does not establish importance of the specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show broader implications in the quick service restaurant industry or business/financial services field. Job creation and revenue projections lacked supporting detail, and importance of the industry does not establish importance of the specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-13_01_B5203; source_row=32803 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed the accountant's letter lacked corroborating documentation; corporate tax returns do not establish individual income; personal tax returns filed after the petition date cannot establish eligibility at filing; and there was no comparative salary data to show the Petitioner's earnings were indicative of exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the accountant's letter lacked corroborating documentation; corporate tax returns do not establish individual income; personal tax returns filed after the petition date cannot establish eligibility at filing; and there was no comparative salary data to show the Petitioner's earnings were indicative of exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B5203; source_row=32797 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the four organizations are not professional associations within the regulatory definition, and that the IAM membership certificate was issued to a company rather than to the Petitioner personally.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the four organizations are not professional associations within the regulatory definition, and that the IAM membership certificate was issued to a company rather than to the Petitioner personally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B5203; source_row=32798 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the record contained no evidence demonstrating that either of the two companies had a distinguished reputation—no media reports, rankings, industry awards, or independent evidence of standing in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the record contained no evidence demonstrating that either of the two companies had a distinguished reputation—no media reports, rankings, industry awards, or independent evidence of standing in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B2203; source_row=32791 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the EO membership requirements—based on founding/owning a company with $1M+ annual revenue plus an interview for 'fit'—do not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are judged by recognized national or international experts. The record lacked a description of the decision-making process or identification of who makes membership decisions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the EO membership requirements—based on founding/owning a company with $1M+ annual revenue plus an interview for 'fit'—do not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are judged by recognized national or international experts. The record lacked a description of the decision-making process or identification of who makes membership decisions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B2203; source_row=32789 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit (IT progress is important to U.S. competitiveness and could create jobs), but concluded the Petitioner did not show his specific consultancy would broadly affect the national economy or the IT field. The business plan was internally inconsistent regarding employment numbers and there was no claim of advances in the IT field or benefit to an economically depressed area.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit (IT progress is important to U.S. competitiveness and could create jobs), but concluded the Petitioner did not show his specific consultancy would broadly affect the national economy or the IT field. The business plan was internally inconsistent regarding employment numbers and there was no claim of advances in the IT field or benefit to an economically depressed area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_01_B5203; source_row=32786 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
Ten years of full-time experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed that letters from former and current employers, combined with the length of employment and job responsibilities described, established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner has at least ten years of full-time experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that letters from former and current employers, combined with the length of employment and job responsibilities described, established by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner has at least ten years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B5203; source_row=32795 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner's course certificates in areas such as Microsoft Access, Excel, Introduction to Maritime Transportation, and Integrated Foreign Trade System relate to his claimed field of exceptional ability and satisfy the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's course certificates in areas such as Microsoft Access, Excel, Introduction to Maritime Transportation, and Integrated Foreign Trade System relate to his claimed field of exceptional ability and satisfy the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-12_02_B5203; source_row=32794 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c