Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7911–7920
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO reserves this prong because the EB-2 exceptional ability denial is dispositive.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserves this prong because the EB-2 exceptional ability denial is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-11_07_B5203; source_row=32780 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relate to the second prong but did not reach a conclusion on this prong because prong one was dispositive.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relate to the second prong but did not reach a conclusion on this prong because prong one was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-11_02_B5203; source_row=32762 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner met the EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional, making a finding on exceptional ability unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner met the EB-2 classification as an advanced degree professional, making a finding on exceptional ability unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-11_04_B5203; source_row=32768 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reviewed the totality of evidence—the Brazilian law degree, transcripts, credential evaluation, and self-employment documentation—and found the Petitioner more likely than not possessed a foreign equivalent of a bachelor's degree plus at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the totality of evidence—the Brazilian law degree, transcripts, credential evaluation, and self-employment documentation—and found the Petitioner more likely than not possessed a foreign equivalent of a bachelor's degree plus at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-11_04_B5203; source_row=32767 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary under Bagamasbad. AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and ability claims relate to the second prong rather than the first.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary under Bagamasbad. AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and ability claims relate to the second prong rather than the first.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-11_08_B5203; source_row=32784 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the Petitioner's proposed endeavor does not sufficiently extend beyond her company and its clientele to broadly impact the industry or field at a level commensurate with national importance. The Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner's proposed endeavor does not sufficiently extend beyond her company and its clientele to broadly impact the industry or field at a level commensurate with national importance. The Petitioner did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally. Her appeal merely restated her expertise without engaging the Director's specific findings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=32755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found substantial merit in the proposed endeavor given the trucking company's role in interstate commerce and delivery services, but found the Petitioner failed to show national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found substantial merit in the proposed endeavor given the trucking company's role in interstate commerce and delivery services, but found the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The business plan projections lacked adequate basis, the expert letter conflicted with other record evidence and was given less weight, and general references to small business and immigrant entrepreneur studies did not establish broader national or global implications specific to the Petitioner's endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-07_06_B5203; source_row=32746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but concluded it lacks national importance because the Petitioner did not show how his specific proposed work—continuing as operations manager for his current employer—would have broader implications for the industry or the nation.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but concluded it lacks national importance because the Petitioner did not show how his specific proposed work—continuing as operations manager for his current employer—would have broader implications for the industry or the nation. Expert letters addressed broader technologies not included in the proposed endeavor, and infrastructure reports focused on the industry as a whole rather than the Petitioner's specific work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-07_03_B5203; source_row=32737 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's Venezuelan diploma was evaluated as equivalent only to a U.S. associate's degree, not a bachelor's degree. The regulations require at least a bachelor's degree as the foundation for the advanced-degree equivalency, and experience cannot substitute for that foundational degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's Venezuelan diploma was evaluated as equivalent only to a U.S. associate's degree, not a bachelor's degree. The regulations require at least a bachelor's degree as the foundation for the advanced-degree equivalency, and experience cannot substitute for that foundational degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-07-07_03_B5203; source_row=32729 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c