Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8381–8390
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner established substantial merit but the NEA Strategic Plan did not address his specific endeavor. AAO adopted the Director's finding on this prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner established substantial merit but the NEA Strategic Plan did not address his specific endeavor. AAO adopted the Director's finding on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_02_B5203; source_row=32010 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's statements were generalized and unsupported by specific plans. The financial forecasts in the business plan lacked evidentiary basis, her stated contacts were undocumented, and there was no showing the endeavor would produce substantial positive economic effects beyond the company's own clientele.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's statements were generalized and unsupported by specific plans. The financial forecasts in the business plan lacked evidentiary basis, her stated contacts were undocumented, and there was no showing the endeavor would produce substantial positive economic effects beyond the company's own clientele.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_08_B5203; source_row=32030 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree qualification via bachelor's degree plus five years progressive experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the 2015 degree was post-graduate coursework, and the Petitioner's foreign equivalent bachelor's degree was received in 2012. Combined with employer letters showing more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience after 2012, the Petitioner satisfies the advanced degree requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the 2015 degree was post-graduate coursework, and the Petitioner's foreign equivalent bachelor's degree was received in 2012. Combined with employer letters showing more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience after 2012, the Petitioner satisfies the advanced degree requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_08_B5203; source_row=32029 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor post-filing (from working at a healthcare facility to operating her own company), which could not retroactively establish eligibility.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor post-filing (from working at a healthcare facility to operating her own company), which could not retroactively establish eligibility. Even setting that aside, the business plan's revenue and staffing projections were unsupported, the practice of physical therapy directly benefits only a small number of individual patients, and the record did not show broader national-level impact. A physical therapist shortage does not by itself make the proposed endeavor nationally important.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_04_B5203; source_row=32017 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds the Petitioner's report presented at the II International Conference and published in the conference materials was intended for learned persons in his fields, and the conference materials qualify as professional trade material distributed to scientists and specialists in economics and political science.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Petitioner's report presented at the II International Conference and published in the conference materials was intended for learned persons in his fields, and the conference materials qualify as professional trade material distributed to scientists and specialists in economics and political science.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_01_B2203; source_row=32002 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
EconomicsMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds the Zhas Alash interview is about the Petitioner and relates to his work in economics and political science, and that evidence including its 90-year history and circulation of 50,000 demonstrates it was a major publication at the time of publication in 1996.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Zhas Alash interview is about the Petitioner and relates to his work in economics and political science, and that evidence including its 90-year history and circulation of 50,000 demonstrates it was a major publication at the time of publication in 1996.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_01_B2203; source_row=32001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO finds the Kazakhstan Presidential decree establishing the medal conveys national recognition of the medal for significant contributions in economics and political science, and that the articles do not suggest employment status was the reason for receipt.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Kazakhstan Presidential decree establishing the medal conveys national recognition of the medal for significant contributions in economics and political science, and that the articles do not suggest employment status was the reason for receipt.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_01_B2203; source_row=32000 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the expert letters addressed the importance of the agricultural and food industries generally but did not demonstrate the specific national impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Business plan projections lacked corroborating evidence and did not show that economic benefits would reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the expert letters addressed the importance of the agricultural and food industries generally but did not demonstrate the specific national impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Business plan projections lacked corroborating evidence and did not show that economic benefits would reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-05-04_06_B5203; source_row=32023 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c