Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8521–8530
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner served as co-captain of a university women's swimming and diving team with a distinguished reputation, and that USCIS policy permits considering leading roles within a division or department of an organization, contrary to the Director's narrower interpretation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner served as co-captain of a university women's swimming and diving team with a distinguished reputation, and that USCIS policy permits considering leading roles within a division or department of an organization, contrary to the Director's narrower interpretation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-14_01_B2203; source_row=31783 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the exhibitions were commercial in nature rather than artistic. The materials for one market described it as a commercial exhibition 'for the business of fashion' attended by buyers for boutiques and department stores, which does not satisfy the requirement that the event be artistic in nature.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the exhibitions were commercial in nature rather than artistic. The materials for one market described it as a commercial exhibition 'for the business of fashion' attended by buyers for boutiques and department stores, which does not satisfy the requirement that the event be artistic in nature.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-13_01_B2203; source_row=31758 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner has not established she is a performing artist, nor submitted the type of evidence specifically called for in the regulation (box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales). The accountant's letter did not suggest the income was earned as a performing artist.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner has not established she is a performing artist, nor submitted the type of evidence specifically called for in the regulation (box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales). The accountant's letter did not suggest the income was earned as a performing artist.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-13_01_B2203; source_row=31759 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the construction and infrastructure industries generally rather than his specific proposed endeavor. The record contained insufficient information about projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's specific work, and the evidence did not show his solutions or skills differed from those already available in the United States.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed the importance of the construction and infrastructure industries generally rather than his specific proposed endeavor. The record contained insufficient information about projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's specific work, and the evidence did not show his solutions or skills differed from those already available in the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-13_03_B5203; source_row=31777 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the document is identified as an 'identity card' with no demonstrated licensing requirements, and the Petitioner's claimed endeavor as an entrepreneur creating a music education tool does not require such a license, so the criterion is not satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the document is identified as an 'identity card' with no demonstrated licensing requirements, and the Petitioner's claimed endeavor as an entrepreneur creating a music education tool does not require such a license, so the criterion is not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-13_01_B5203; source_row=31765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the letters reflect personal regard and the potential of an unreleased product rather than recognition for actual achievements or significant contributions, and the lectures/workshops were promotional in nature, so the criterion is not satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters reflect personal regard and the potential of an unreleased product rather than recognition for actual achievements or significant contributions, and the lectures/workshops were promotional in nature, so the criterion is not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-04-13_01_B5203; source_row=31767 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c