Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8631–8640
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to consider comparative salary data submitted for the first time on appeal, and noted that even if considered, the data actually showed the Petitioner's U.S. and Australian earnings were below the averages reported in the salary surveys.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider comparative salary data submitted for the first time on appeal, and noted that even if considered, the data actually showed the Petitioner's U.S. and Australian earnings were below the averages reported in the salary surveys.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=31621 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked any description or evidence demonstrating that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor—providing counseling and conducting addiction research—would have national importance or broadly impact the mental health field. AAO noted the analogy to Dhanasar itself, where teaching activities did not rise to national importance without broader field impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked any description or evidence demonstrating that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor—providing counseling and conducting addiction research—would have national importance or broadly impact the mental health field. AAO noted the analogy to Dhanasar itself, where teaching activities did not rise to national importance without broader field impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-31_02_B5203; source_row=31626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Post-filing documents were disregarded under Izummi. The expert letter was overly vague and conclusory. The Petitioner did not provide specific evidence of prospective national-level impact, potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects beyond his own company or its direct clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Post-filing documents were disregarded under Izummi. The expert letter was overly vague and conclusory. The Petitioner did not provide specific evidence of prospective national-level impact, potential to employ U.S. workers, or substantial positive economic effects beyond his own company or its direct clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-30_01_B5203; source_row=31610 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that although some publications had relatively high circulation figures, the Petitioner failed to contextualize those statistics relative to other Chinese newspapers, and failed to establish the publications had national rather than regional reach. Publications with only a regional reach are not considered major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although some publications had relatively high circulation figures, the Petitioner failed to contextualize those statistics relative to other Chinese newspapers, and failed to establish the publications had national rather than regional reach. Publications with only a regional reach are not considered major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-29_02_B2203; source_row=31590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner held a leading role for the bassoon section, she did not provide sufficient documentation to establish she played a leading role in the organization as a whole. Leading a single section of a symphony does not constitute a leading role for the overall organization, and she did not show influence over the organization's overall reputation, status, or success.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner held a leading role for the bassoon section, she did not provide sufficient documentation to establish she played a leading role in the organization as a whole. Leading a single section of a symphony does not constitute a leading role for the overall organization, and she did not show influence over the organization's overall reputation, status, or success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-29_02_B2203; source_row=31594 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the reference letters lacked specific, detailed information explaining the unusual influence or high impact the Beneficiary's contributions had on the overall field, and speaking/panelist engagements alone did not demonstrate contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the reference letters lacked specific, detailed information explaining the unusual influence or high impact the Beneficiary's contributions had on the overall field, and speaking/panelist engagements alone did not demonstrate contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-29_03_B2203; source_row=31599 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c