Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 8671–8680

NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations (k)(3)(ii)(E)

Why the evidence was persuasive

Petitioner documented membership in the Air Canada Pilots Association and the College of Professional Pilots of Canada.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner documented membership in the Air Canada Pilots Association and the College of Professional Pilots of Canada.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31575
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

ten years full-time experience (k)(3)(ii)(B)

Why AAO was not persuaded

Only one employer letter (May 2012–April 2019) confirmed full-time employment, insufficient to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience as a pilot.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Only one employer letter (May 2012–April 2019) confirmed full-time employment, insufficient to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience as a pilot.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record (resume, diploma, work letters, license, memberships) does not show he is well-positioned to advance his endeavor, particularly because he is not licensed to fly in the United States.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The record (resume, diploma, work letters, license, memberships) does not show he is well-positioned to advance his endeavor, particularly because he is not licensed to fly in the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31578
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

high salary or remuneration (k)(3)(ii)(D)

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner submitted no salary evidence and stated his union-set salary is the same as his colleagues.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner submitted no salary evidence and stated his union-set salary is the same as his colleagues.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31574
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

license to practice the profession (k)(3)(ii)(C)

Why the evidence was persuasive

Petitioner submitted his Canadian Aviation License, FAA medical certificate, and an FAA letter verifying his foreign license is valid and current.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner submitted his Canadian Aviation License, FAA medical certificate, and an FAA letter verifying his foreign license is valid and current.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31573
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements/significant contributions (k)(3)(ii)(F)

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner expressly conceded he had no evidence for this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner expressly conceded he had no evidence for this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-28_03_B5203; source_row=31576
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The evidence addressed the importance of the HR industry generally and the Petitioner's personal qualifications rather than the specific prospective national impact of her proposed endeavor. Her plans and support letters did not show how her services would extend beyond individual client businesses to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The evidence addressed the importance of the HR industry generally and the Petitioner's personal qualifications rather than the specific prospective national impact of her proposed endeavor. Her plans and support letters did not show how her services would extend beyond individual client businesses to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly. Claimed job creation of 8 workers was unsupported by documentary evidence and insufficient to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-27_03_B5203; source_row=31557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not discuss the criteria used to grant the award, did not explain why the award was nationally recognized, and submitted little evidence about El Tiempo's reputation or circulation. Mere receipt of a newspaper recognition is insufficient without further explanation and evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not discuss the criteria used to grant the award, did not explain why the award was nationally recognized, and submitted little evidence about El Tiempo's reputation or circulation. Mere receipt of a newspaper recognition is insufficient without further explanation and evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-27_01_B2203; source_row=31544
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the noncitizen in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner submitted insufficient evidence to establish that either article was published in major media: circulation data was unclear, outdated, or unverified. Additionally, the published material related to the Petitioner's work as an athlete, not as a coach, which is his stated field of endeavor for classification purposes.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted insufficient evidence to establish that either article was published in major media: circulation data was unclear, outdated, or unverified. Additionally, the published material related to the Petitioner's work as an athlete, not as a coach, which is his stated field of endeavor for classification purposes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-27_01_B2203; source_row=31545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concludes Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because she focused on the importance of the SCM/logistics industry rather than the prospective impact of her specific endeavor, and did not show substantial potential to employ U.S. workers or generate broader economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concludes Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because she focused on the importance of the SCM/logistics industry rather than the prospective impact of her specific endeavor, and did not show substantial potential to employ U.S. workers or generate broader economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-27_04_B5203; source_row=31560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment