Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8731–8740
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision that the Petitioner had not established she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, without additional independent analysis.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision that the Petitioner had not established she is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, without additional independent analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_05_B5203; source_row=31503 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
On motion, AAO found that the Petitioner's statement about researching applicability of machine learning and graph data mining to solve complex problems like COVID-19 spread patterns provided a sufficiently specific proposed endeavor. AAO further applied USCIS STEM policy manual guidance and concluded that research projects in sensor networks and machine learning have broad implications demonstrating national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
On motion, AAO found that the Petitioner's statement about researching applicability of machine learning and graph data mining to solve complex problems like COVID-19 spread patterns provided a sufficiently specific proposed endeavor. AAO further applied USCIS STEM policy manual guidance and concluded that research projects in sensor networks and machine learning have broad implications demonstrating national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_05_B5203; source_row=31502 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or equivalent (five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters covering confirmed full-time employment span less than five years; the letter from one employer fails to confirm full-time status; and the Petitioner did not address the Director's credibility findings about inconsistencies in the evaluation letters.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters covering confirmed full-time employment span less than five years; the letter from one employer fails to confirm full-time status; and the Petitioner did not address the Director's credibility findings about inconsistencies in the evaluation letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_03_B5203; source_row=31491 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why AAO was not persuaded
One employer letter fails to confirm full-time status, and the letters from other employers account for less than five years of full-time experience in the aggregate, falling well short of ten years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
One employer letter fails to confirm full-time status, and the letters from other employers account for less than five years of full-time experience in the aggregate, falling well short of ten years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_03_B5203; source_row=31493 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Inconsistency regarding claimed enrollment at redacted university
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's initially submitted resume did not include 'in-view' language as claimed, and she provided no credible or logical explanation for listing the university with a June 2015 date under educational qualifications alongside schools she had actually attended and graduated from, without evidence she had even applied for admission.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's initially submitted resume did not include 'in-view' language as claimed, and she provided no credible or logical explanation for listing the university with a June 2015 date under educational qualifications alongside schools she had actually attended and graduated from, without evidence she had even applied for admission.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=31482 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO identified concerns with the authenticity of recommendation letters, including an unsigned letter with a mismatched address and a letterhead with quality and formatting anomalies inconsistent with the purported source.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO identified concerns with the authenticity of recommendation letters, including an unsigned letter with a mismatched address and a letterhead with quality and formatting anomalies inconsistent with the purported source.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=31485 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO was unable to corroborate the Petitioner's publication claims and found that an apparent discrepancy in conference dates undermined the claim about a specific conference presentation. AAO also noted it was unclear how someone whose stated focus is regulatory affairs would be performing and publishing research in oncology, and that her resume contained no information regarding publications or cancer research.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO was unable to corroborate the Petitioner's publication claims and found that an apparent discrepancy in conference dates undermined the claim about a specific conference presentation. AAO also noted it was unclear how someone whose stated focus is regulatory affairs would be performing and publishing research in oncology, and that her resume contained no information regarding publications or cancer research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=31483 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Discrepancies between resume and prior visa applications
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's prior nonimmigrant visa applications described occupations—customer service and child support work—entirely inconsistent with her resume's claim of working in regulatory affairs since September 2006, and that neither of the positions on her NIV applications appeared on her resume.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's prior nonimmigrant visa applications described occupations—customer service and child support work—entirely inconsistent with her resume's claim of working in regulatory affairs since September 2006, and that neither of the positions on her NIV applications appeared on her resume.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=31484 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c