Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 8751–8760

NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Salary or other remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Director erred by focusing solely on salaries; the regulatory standard covers 'salary, or other remuneration for services.' The tax returns demonstrated remuneration including dividends, and the salary survey showed the Beneficiary received substantially more than the average for comparable positions, suggesting exceptional ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred by focusing solely on salaries; the regulatory standard covers 'salary, or other remuneration for services.' The tax returns demonstrated remuneration including dividends, and the salary survey showed the Beneficiary received substantially more than the average for comparable positions, suggesting exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=31445
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Official academic record — certificate from institution of learning

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO held that an 'official academic record' is not limited to a diploma, and for exceptional ability it may be a certificate from 'a college, university, school, or other institution of learning.' The BTEC certificate constitutes a certificate from an institution of learning relating to the Beneficiary's field, and there was no reason to doubt its authenticity.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO held that an 'official academic record' is not limited to a diploma, and for exceptional ability it may be a certificate from 'a college, university, school, or other institution of learning.' The BTEC certificate constitutes a certificate from an institution of learning relating to the Beneficiary's field, and there was no reason to doubt its authenticity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=31443
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Letters showing at least 10 years of full-time experience

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Beneficiary satisfied the evidentiary standard for at least 10 years of full-time experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the Beneficiary satisfied the evidentiary standard for at least 10 years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=31444
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

Well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO found the Director failed to clearly explain the specific reasons for denial, improperly focused only on education rather than considering the Beneficiary's experience, skills, knowledge, and interests of potential customers, in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(i) and Dhanasar.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to clearly explain the specific reasons for denial, improperly focused only on education rather than considering the Beneficiary's experience, skills, knowledge, and interests of potential customers, in violation of 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(i) and Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_01_B5203; source_row=31448
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concluded the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the endeavor based on his credentials, research plan, employer support, recommendation letters, and named-inventor patents.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the endeavor based on his credentials, research plan, employer support, recommendation letters, and named-inventor patents.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_02_B5203; source_row=31451
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Petitioner provided detailed and consistent statements supported by strong corroborating evidence demonstrating both substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner provided detailed and consistent statements supported by strong corroborating evidence demonstrating both substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_02_B5203; source_row=31450
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

Why the evidence was persuasive

Considering the totality of the evidence, AAO concluded the Petitioner's prospective contributions would benefit the United States even if other qualified workers were available, justifying waiver of the labor certification.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
Considering the totality of the evidence, AAO concluded the Petitioner's prospective contributions would benefit the United States even if other qualified workers were available, justifying waiver of the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-17_02_B5203; source_row=31452
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the recommendation letters establish that the Beneficiary is a well-respected coach who has had success developing players recruited to MLS academies or colleges, this does not establish that his coaching activities will have national or global implications. The evidence speaks to the soccer industry overall and to the substantial merit of the endeavor, not its national importance.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the recommendation letters establish that the Beneficiary is a well-respected coach who has had success developing players recruited to MLS academies or colleges, this does not establish that his coaching activities will have national or global implications. The evidence speaks to the soccer industry overall and to the substantial merit of the endeavor, not its national importance. Without a plan to disseminate his methodology broadly or evidence of scale commensurate with national importance, the first prong is not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_01_B5203; source_row=31418
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that neither credential evaluation was persuasive: USCES concluded equivalence to a U.S. master's degree without adequate explanation, and GEO did not state any U.S. equivalence for the academic credentials alone. No individual diploma or certificate constituted the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree, and the Petitioner could not show five years of post-baccalaureate experience by the filing date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that neither credential evaluation was persuasive: USCES concluded equivalence to a U.S. master's degree without adequate explanation, and GEO did not state any U.S. equivalence for the academic credentials alone. No individual diploma or certificate constituted the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree, and the Petitioner could not show five years of post-baccalaureate experience by the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_02_B5203; source_row=31421
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director that substantial merit was not shown—finding that business-area endeavors have substantial merit—but agreed that national importance was not established. The Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond his company and its clients, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or provide substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director that substantial merit was not shown—finding that business-area endeavors have substantial merit—but agreed that national importance was not established. The Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond his company and its clients, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or provide substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_02_B5203; source_row=31422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment