Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8761–8770
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, finding that evidence primarily related to the general importance of entrepreneurship and technology rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance, finding that evidence primarily related to the general importance of entrepreneurship and technology rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The company's tax returns showed modest and local operations, the licensing agreements were limited to a local Florida area, business plan projections were unsupported, and the endeavor did not show substantial positive economic effects at the regional or national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_03_B5203; source_row=31425 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor as a marketing director specializing in Brazilian travel did not demonstrate national importance because it would not extend sufficiently beyond her employer or clientele to impact the travel and tourism industry or U.S. economy at a national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's initial proposed endeavor as a marketing director specializing in Brazilian travel did not demonstrate national importance because it would not extend sufficiently beyond her employer or clientele to impact the travel and tourism industry or U.S. economy at a national level. The AAO also found the Petitioner made an impermissible material change by introducing a new food business endeavor in the RFE reply, which could not be considered to retroactively establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_06_B5203; source_row=31440 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Evidence of roles in competitions and professional organizations pertained to whether the Petitioner is well-positioned (prong 2), not national importance. New evidence on appeal was substantially similar to existing evidence and did not cure the deficiency. A post-filing concert performance could not be considered.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. Evidence of roles in competitions and professional organizations pertained to whether the Petitioner is well-positioned (prong 2), not national importance. New evidence on appeal was substantially similar to existing evidence and did not cure the deficiency. A post-filing concert performance could not be considered. Like the STEM teacher in Dhanasar itself, the Petitioner has not shown his endeavor would impact the field beyond his own students or event attendees.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_05_B5203; source_row=31437 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / EnergyProfessorMaster’s
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employment letters fail to show ten years of full-time experience as a law professor. Some letters show part-time work, lack clear end dates, or describe non-teaching roles such as executive secretary and conciliator.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employment letters fail to show ten years of full-time experience as a law professor. Some letters show part-time work, lack clear end dates, or describe non-teaching roles such as executive secretary and conciliator.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=31429 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / EnergyProfessorMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO does not reach a substantive conclusion on prong 1, instead remanding for the Director to reevaluate the proposed endeavor in light of potential material changes raised on appeal.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach a substantive conclusion on prong 1, instead remanding for the Director to reevaluate the proposed endeavor in light of potential material changes raised on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=31433 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agrees that recommendation letters and certificates of recognition show appreciation from local employers and communities but do not establish industry- or field-level recognition for achievements and significant contributions. AAO remands consideration of additional conference and article evidence the Director did not previously review.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees that recommendation letters and certificates of recognition show appreciation from local employers and communities but do not establish industry- or field-level recognition for achievements and significant contributions. AAO remands consideration of additional conference and article evidence the Director did not previously review.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=31432 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner asserted on appeal that the Director did not consider this criterion and submitted membership evidence. AAO remands for the Director's consideration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner asserted on appeal that the Director did not consider this criterion and submitted membership evidence. AAO remands for the Director's consideration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=31431 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / EnergyProfessorMaster’s
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification to practice the occupation
What the decision said
Petitioner submitted on appeal new evidence of her registration as a lawyer in Brazil and bar admission requirements. AAO remands so the Director can consider this evidence in the first instance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner submitted on appeal new evidence of her registration as a lawyer in Brazil and bar admission requirements. AAO remands so the Director can consider this evidence in the first instance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-16_04_B5203; source_row=31430 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c