Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8821–8830
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner claimed IBA guild membership, but the IBA bylaws did not demonstrate that guild membership requires outstanding achievement or that the approval voting is judged by recognized national or international experts in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner claimed IBA guild membership, but the IBA bylaws did not demonstrate that guild membership requires outstanding achievement or that the approval voting is judged by recognized national or international experts in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=31349 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted evidence of attending conferences, competitions, and educational trainings, but the record did not show that his work product as a barman was displayed, or that these events were artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted evidence of attending conferences, competitions, and educational trainings, but the record did not show that his work product as a barman was displayed, or that these events were artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=31353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's evidence showed participation in events and support for associations but did not identify specific original contributions. Reference letters praised the Petitioner in conclusory terms but lacked specifics about original contributions and their major significance to the field. Evidence showed positive impact within Armenia's bartending industry but not major significance to the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's evidence showed participation in events and support for associations but did not identify specific original contributions. Reference letters praised the Petitioner in conclusory terms but lacked specifics about original contributions and their major significance to the field. Evidence showed positive impact within Armenia's bartending industry but not major significance to the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-13_03_B2203; source_row=31352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's IT instructor role, though meritorious, was not shown to have national importance because it would not impact the IT or STEM industry more broadly beyond the students directly taught, and he did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's IT instructor role, though meritorious, was not shown to have national importance because it would not impact the IT or STEM industry more broadly beyond the students directly taught, and he did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-13_02_B5203; source_row=31344 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. AAO noted the Petitioner failed to show how her marketing management work would extend beyond her immediate employer clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly, and also rejected the materially changed proposed endeavor (launching her own agency) because it arose only after filing.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but lacked national importance. AAO noted the Petitioner failed to show how her marketing management work would extend beyond her immediate employer clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy broadly, and also rejected the materially changed proposed endeavor (launching her own agency) because it arose only after filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-13_05_B5203; source_row=31364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c