Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8941–8950
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot established
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked comparative salary data for systems engineers in the field of industrial automation in Brazil during the relevant period, so it was impossible to establish that the salary was indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked comparative salary data for systems engineers in the field of industrial automation in Brazil during the relevant period, so it was impossible to establish that the salary was indicative of exceptional ability relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_02_B5203; source_row=31183 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
A corporation and an individual are two separate legal entities. The Petitioner's company may be a member of the association, but the Petitioner himself is not a member of a professional association.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
A corporation and an individual are two separate legal entities. The Petitioner's company may be a member of the association, but the Petitioner himself is not a member of a professional association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_02_B5203; source_row=31184 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
meeting at least three of six exceptional ability criteria
Why AAO was not persuaded
Because the Petitioner did not identify at least three qualifying criteria on appeal and the record does not support such a conclusion, AAO declined to further address exceptional ability qualification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner did not identify at least three qualifying criteria on appeal and the record does not support such a conclusion, AAO declined to further address exceptional ability qualification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=31179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the accounting degree does not relate to exceptional ability in police investigation, and the training certificates are not from qualifying academic institutions, so criterion (A) is not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the accounting degree does not relate to exceptional ability in police investigation, and the training certificates are not from qualifying academic institutions, so criterion (A) is not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=31178 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree qualification (bachelor's plus experience in specialty)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that because the bachelor's degree in accounting is not in the specialty of police investigation, the Petitioner fails to satisfy the 'in the specialty' requirement for the bachelor's-plus-experience equivalency, rendering him ineligible as an advanced degree professional.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that because the bachelor's degree in accounting is not in the specialty of police investigation, the Petitioner fails to satisfy the 'in the specialty' requirement for the bachelor's-plus-experience equivalency, rendering him ineligible as an advanced degree professional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B5203; source_row=31177 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
critical or leading role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director's characterization contrary to the evidence: letters provided detailed descriptions of the Petitioner's critical roles and their company-level impacts (e.g., securing $80M/year contracts, gaining global contracts with Pepsi and Coca-Cola). Companies were shown to be multi-billion-dollar enterprises operating worldwide.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's characterization contrary to the evidence: letters provided detailed descriptions of the Petitioner's critical roles and their company-level impacts (e.g., securing $80M/year contracts, gaining global contracts with Pepsi and Coca-Cola). Companies were shown to be multi-billion-dollar enterprises operating worldwide.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=31175 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Director miscategorized detailed letters from former colleagues as mere expert recommendation letters, failing to analyze them properly. The letters contained detailed descriptions of original contributions of major significance, including a WHO-endorsed tuberculosis tube design and a ground-breaking manufacturing platform for pharmaceutical packaging.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director miscategorized detailed letters from former colleagues as mere expert recommendation letters, failing to analyze them properly. The letters contained detailed descriptions of original contributions of major significance, including a WHO-endorsed tuberculosis tube design and a ground-breaking manufacturing platform for pharmaceutical packaging.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=31173 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
A letter from a senior officer at the Petitioner's former employer sufficiently describes his participation as a judge in packaging innovation competitions that provided funding to winning concepts, satisfying the basic elements of this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
A letter from a senior officer at the Petitioner's former employer sufficiently describes his participation as a judge in packaging innovation competitions that provided funding to winning concepts, satisfying the basic elements of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-03-01_01_B2203; source_row=31172 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c