Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 8961–8970
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the AAO accepted that the Petitioner actually received the claimed awards (disagreeing with the Director's skepticism on that point), the record still lacked documentation showing the World Championship Horse Show grants a prize considered internationally recognized at the caliber required.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the AAO accepted that the Petitioner actually received the claimed awards (disagreeing with the Director's skepticism on that point), the record still lacked documentation showing the World Championship Horse Show grants a prize considered internationally recognized at the caliber required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_04_B2203; source_row=31159 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that comparing remuneration only to other Chinese professional tennis players rather than all professional tennis players at the top level of the field was insufficient to demonstrate significantly high remuneration consistent with the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that comparing remuneration only to other Chinese professional tennis players rather than all professional tennis players at the top level of the field was insufficient to demonstrate significantly high remuneration consistent with the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_05_B2203; source_row=31169 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the submitted materials failed to establish the websites as major media due to lack of contextualizing data, missing author information, and reliance on self-reported figures. Additionally, because the Petitioner intends to enter as a tennis coach rather than a player, published material about him as a competitor does not fall within his claimed field of endeavor as a coach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the submitted materials failed to establish the websites as major media due to lack of contextualizing data, missing author information, and reliance on self-reported figures. Additionally, because the Petitioner intends to enter as a tennis coach rather than a player, published material about him as a competitor does not fall within his claimed field of endeavor as a coach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_05_B2203; source_row=31168 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate he was the article's author, having neither provided corroborating evidence from the publisher nor a legal authority permitting the authorship requirement to be set aside. Because authorship is a dispositive element, it was unnecessary to evaluate the publication type.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate he was the article's author, having neither provided corroborating evidence from the publisher nor a legal authority permitting the authorship requirement to be set aside. Because authorship is a dispositive element, it was unnecessary to evaluate the publication type.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_01_B2203; source_row=31141 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The municipal government award appears regional in nature and the Petitioner did not provide probative evidence of national or international recognition beyond the issuing entity. The science and technology awards from the medical organization appear to be at a level lesser than nationally or internationally recognized awards, as winning projects are merely recommended for national awards rather than being national awards t…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The municipal government award appears regional in nature and the Petitioner did not provide probative evidence of national or international recognition beyond the issuing entity. The science and technology awards from the medical organization appear to be at a level lesser than nationally or internationally recognized awards, as winning projects are merely recommended for national awards rather than being national awards themselves. The medical sciences awards, though from a reputable entity, are over a decade old and the Petitioner did not establish they were nationally or internationally recognized in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=31148 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The article lacked a certified translation as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), did not contain the article's date as the regulation requires, and the Petitioner did not provide circulation figures to establish that the publication qualifies as a major trade publication or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article lacked a certified translation as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), did not contain the article's date as the regulation requires, and the Petitioner did not provide circulation figures to establish that the publication qualifies as a major trade publication or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=31149 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
One-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that the award must be global in scope and internationally recognized in the foreign national's field as one of the top awards in that field, citing the Nobel Prize as Congress's example. The Petitioner failed to show the award was widely reported by international media, recognized by the general public, or comparable to major globally recognized awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the award must be global in scope and internationally recognized in the foreign national's field as one of the top awards in that field, citing the Nobel Prize as Congress's example. The Petitioner failed to show the award was widely reported by international media, recognized by the general public, or comparable to major globally recognized awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_03_B2203; source_row=31157 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_04_B2203; source_row=31165 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a decision on this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the required three criteria threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a decision on this criterion because even if met, the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the required three criteria threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-28_05_B2203; source_row=31167 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c