Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO applied the three-part Dial Auto Repair Shop test and found the Petitioner failed the first condition: no evidence showed the merger was filed with the relevant state authority before the petition was filed. Furthermore, the successor-in-interest doctrine did not apply because the Petitioner itself filed all prior benefit requests, leaving nothing to 'assume' from the predecessor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO applied the three-part Dial Auto Repair Shop test and found the Petitioner failed the first condition: no evidence showed the merger was filed with the relevant state authority before the petition was filed. Furthermore, the successor-in-interest doctrine did not apply because the Petitioner itself filed all prior benefit requests, leaving nothing to 'assume' from the predecessor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-27_02_B5203; source_row=31138 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor, including operating her own business, does not extend beyond her company and its clientele to impact the industry or field more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance, and that she has not shown significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor, including operating her own business, does not extend beyond her company and its clientele to impact the industry or field more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance, and that she has not shown significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_01_B5203; source_row=31125 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's final merits determination, agreeing that the evidence in totality did not establish the Petitioner's expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the helicopter pilot field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's final merits determination, agreeing that the evidence in totality did not establish the Petitioner's expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the helicopter pilot field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B5203; source_row=31134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other2,007 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that supporting evidence must reflect readership proximate to publication to show the medium's stature at the time. Several articles predated the circulation data by up to 15 years, reducing their probative value; one article was not about the Petitioner; one article lacked a known publication date; and the translation for the Fakty Ukraine article lacked a required certification while its circulation data came f…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that supporting evidence must reflect readership proximate to publication to show the medium's stature at the time. Several articles predated the circulation data by up to 15 years, reducing their probative value; one article was not about the Petitioner; one article lacked a known publication date; and the translation for the Fakty Ukraine article lacked a required certification while its circulation data came from unreliable Wikipedia sources.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B2203; source_row=31128 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the alternative comparable-evidence argument because the Petitioner's own affirmative materials asserted the standards readily applied, making the two positions irreconcilable. On the merits, appearing in print/digital media does not constitute display at an 'artistic exhibition or showcase,' and runway appearances placed the focus on the fashion items rather than on the Petitioner's own work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the alternative comparable-evidence argument because the Petitioner's own affirmative materials asserted the standards readily applied, making the two positions irreconcilable. On the merits, appearing in print/digital media does not constitute display at an 'artistic exhibition or showcase,' and runway appearances placed the focus on the fashion items rather than on the Petitioner's own work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B2203; source_row=31130 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other2,007 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While some letters characterized the Petitioner as a pioneer for models with a unique appearance, they lacked specifics demonstrating major significance. The Petitioner did not establish that prior to her career models with her features were absent from the industry, nor that her emergence caused a widespread shift in the industry's hiring of similarly featured models.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While some letters characterized the Petitioner as a pioneer for models with a unique appearance, they lacked specifics demonstrating major significance. The Petitioner did not establish that prior to her career models with her features were absent from the industry, nor that her emergence caused a widespread shift in the industry's hiring of similarly featured models.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B2203; source_row=31129 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
commercial success in the performing arts (comparable evidence)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that comparable evidence was categorically impermissible under this criterion, holding instead that comparable evidence demonstrating a monetary or commercially successful aspect could satisfy this criterion.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reasoning that comparable evidence was categorically impermissible under this criterion, holding instead that comparable evidence demonstrating a monetary or commercially successful aspect could satisfy this criterion. However, the Petitioner's evidence lacked the required monetary or commercial component — she did not show compensation figures, revenue increases, or similar financially measurable proof of commercial success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B2203; source_row=31131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and abilities relate to the second prong, which shifts focus to the foreign national, but did not reach a conclusion on this prong because the first prong was not met.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and abilities relate to the second prong, which shifts focus to the foreign national, but did not reach a conclusion on this prong because the first prong was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_01_B5203; source_row=31126 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion (A) was met, concluding that it was not readily apparent the aviation school qualifies as a 'college, university, school or other institution of learning' or that the certificates constitute an 'official academic record' under the regulatory plain language.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion (A) was met, concluding that it was not readily apparent the aviation school qualifies as a 'college, university, school or other institution of learning' or that the certificates constitute an 'official academic record' under the regulatory plain language.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-24_02_B5203; source_row=31133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c