Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9001–9010
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration for services
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding remuneration on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding remuneration on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=31118 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that no articles were submitted, the AAO still found the criterion unmet because the newspaper's readership appeared narrowly focused on Thai-language speakers in a local area, the articles did not relate to the Petitioner's work in the field, and proper certified translations and required identifying information (dates, authors) were not provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that no articles were submitted, the AAO still found the criterion unmet because the newspaper's readership appeared narrowly focused on Thai-language speakers in a local area, the articles did not relate to the Petitioner's work in the field, and proper certified translations and required identifying information (dates, authors) were not provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=31114 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI30 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO found that the Director failed to make a finding on substantial merit and failed to adequately discuss the evidence regarding national importance, making meaningful appellate review impossible. The issue was remanded.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director failed to make a finding on substantial merit and failed to adequately discuss the evidence regarding national importance, making meaningful appellate review impossible. The issue was remanded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-22_01_B5203; source_row=31110 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI30 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO found that the Director's apparent finding on prong 2 was unclear and unsupported by analysis of the record evidence, and remanded for a clear determination.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director's apparent finding on prong 2 was unclear and unsupported by analysis of the record evidence, and remanded for a clear determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-22_01_B5203; source_row=31111 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner offered little to no evidence about the coaching award to establish it is nationally or internationally recognized. The evidence did not demonstrate how many coaches receive the award, who is eligible, or how winners are selected. The mere fact that the club has locations in multiple countries does not establish that a coach of the year award is nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner offered little to no evidence about the coaching award to establish it is nationally or internationally recognized. The evidence did not demonstrate how many coaches receive the award, who is eligible, or how winners are selected. The mere fact that the club has locations in multiple countries does not establish that a coach of the year award is nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-21_02_B2203; source_row=31089 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters praise the Petitioner's qualities and accomplishments but do not identify any original contributions or explain how they have been majorly significant in the field. The evidence shows the Petitioner positively influenced individual players but does not show he affected the field of athletics or soccer as a whole. No specific methods or techniques he developed are described.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters praise the Petitioner's qualities and accomplishments but do not identify any original contributions or explain how they have been majorly significant in the field. The evidence shows the Petitioner positively influenced individual players but does not show he affected the field of athletics or soccer as a whole. No specific methods or techniques he developed are described.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-21_02_B2203; source_row=31092 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO accepted the Petitioner's selection to the main squad of the Belarus National Water Ski Team as comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), reasoning that selection to a country's national team via a multi-level selection process supervised by national experts is the functional equivalent of an association requiring outstanding achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted the Petitioner's selection to the main squad of the Belarus National Water Ski Team as comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4), reasoning that selection to a country's national team via a multi-level selection process supervised by national experts is the functional equivalent of an association requiring outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-21_03_B2203; source_row=31099 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the merits of any Dhanasar prong, remanding the matter because the proposed endeavor itself was not sufficiently identified and may have been materially changed in the RFE response.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits of any Dhanasar prong, remanding the matter because the proposed endeavor itself was not sufficiently identified and may have been materially changed in the RFE response.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-21_03_B5203; source_row=31107 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c