Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9021–9030
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
EconomicsBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the petitioner's background in trade and diplomacy, media coverage, testimonials from senior government officials, publications, and employer description collectively establish sustained national and international acclaim at the top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's background in trade and diplomacy, media coverage, testimonials from senior government officials, publications, and employer description collectively establish sustained national and international acclaim at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B2203; source_row=31065 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
EconomicsBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the petitioner's earnings of $494,749 were more than three times the Level IV economist's prevailing wage for his geographical area in 2020, concluding his salary was high relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's earnings of $494,749 were more than three times the Level IV economist's prevailing wage for his geographical area in 2020, concluding his salary was high relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B2203; source_row=31064 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that IEEE publications qualify as professional publications within the Beneficiary's subfield of AI and robotics, meeting the basic parameters of the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that IEEE publications qualify as professional publications within the Beneficiary's subfield of AI and robotics, meeting the basic parameters of the scholarly articles criterion, contrary to the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31072 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted the awards were primarily for innovation/entrepreneurship rather than excellence in the AI/robotics field specifically.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted the awards were primarily for innovation/entrepreneurship rather than excellence in the AI/robotics field specifically.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31068 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the Beneficiary is a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not assert on appeal that the Beneficiary is a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_02_B2203; source_row=31069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO acknowledged that inconsistencies remained unresolved but concluded that the evidence did not establish whether the Beneficiary willfully misrepresented her qualifications or merely carelessly listed inaccurate dates and hours. AAO also withdrew the Director's finding on employment-date inconsistencies that were not alleged in the NOIR.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged that inconsistencies remained unresolved but concluded that the evidence did not establish whether the Beneficiary willfully misrepresented her qualifications or merely carelessly listed inaccurate dates and hours. AAO also withdrew the Director's finding on employment-date inconsistencies that were not alleged in the NOIR.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B5203; source_row=31067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found no evidence that the Petitioner knew the Beneficiary's credentials were false, and further noted that the NOIR did not allege any misrepresentations by the Petitioner at all — only by the Beneficiary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found no evidence that the Petitioner knew the Beneficiary's credentials were false, and further noted that the NOIR did not allege any misrepresentations by the Petitioner at all — only by the Beneficiary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_01_B5203; source_row=31066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c