Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
completeness of record of proceedings supporting revocation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacks complete copies of the Petitioner's initial brief and supporting documents, and lacks the NOIR response, so AAO cannot determine whether revocation was supported by the record as required by Matter of Estime.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacks complete copies of the Petitioner's initial brief and supporting documents, and lacks the NOIR response, so AAO cannot determine whether revocation was supported by the record as required by Matter of Estime.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_03_B2203; source_row=31078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
continuing ability to pay proffered wage to all I-140 beneficiaries
What the decision said
AAO did not reach a final ability-to-pay determination; instead it withdrew the denial and remanded so the Director could issue a new RFE for a complete I-140 beneficiary list and corresponding wage evidence and adjudicate the new financial evidence in the first instance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a final ability-to-pay determination; instead it withdrew the denial and remanded so the Director could issue a new RFE for a complete I-140 beneficiary list and corresponding wage evidence and adjudicate the new financial evidence in the first instance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-16_03_B5203; source_row=31079 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that none of the three organizations demonstrated they utilized nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge whether prospective members' achievements were outstanding, nor that such an outstanding determination was a condition of membership eligibility. The Petitioner's assertions were conclusory and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that none of the three organizations demonstrated they utilized nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge whether prospective members' achievements were outstanding, nor that such an outstanding determination was a condition of membership eligibility. The Petitioner's assertions were conclusory and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-15_01_B2203; source_row=31056 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Both awards on appeal are primarily accompanied by foreign-language evidence with deficient blanket translation certifications, rendering the evidence of diminished evidentiary value. Additionally, the 2019 innovation award was issued to the Petitioner's university, not to the Petitioner personally, so it does not satisfy the plain language requirement of 'the alien's receipt' of prizes or awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both awards on appeal are primarily accompanied by foreign-language evidence with deficient blanket translation certifications, rendering the evidence of diminished evidentiary value. Additionally, the 2019 innovation award was issued to the Petitioner's university, not to the Petitioner personally, so it does not satisfy the plain language requirement of 'the alien's receipt' of prizes or awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_04_B2203; source_row=31050 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the testimonial letters made only broad, vague, and hyperbolic statements without detailed explanation of how the Petitioner's work was of major significance to the field as a whole. A Senate recommendation of her book was not probative of major significance, as books can be recommended for many reasons. Speaking and conference engagements also lacked evidence of significant field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the testimonial letters made only broad, vague, and hyperbolic statements without detailed explanation of how the Petitioner's work was of major significance to the field as a whole. A Senate recommendation of her book was not probative of major significance, as books can be recommended for many reasons. Speaking and conference engagements also lacked evidence of significant field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_01_B2203; source_row=31029 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner could not rely on salary increases that occurred after filing. The comparative data for operations research analysts was inappropriate because that position is not sufficiently similar to her chief of staff role. Even if the comparison were accepted, her $150,000 salary at the time of filing did not exceed the top-10-percent threshold of $160,850 for operations research analysts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner could not rely on salary increases that occurred after filing. The comparative data for operations research analysts was inappropriate because that position is not sufficiently similar to her chief of staff role. Even if the comparison were accepted, her $150,000 salary at the time of filing did not exceed the top-10-percent threshold of $160,850 for operations research analysts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31046 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The metronews.ru piece lacked an identifiable author separate from the publication, and evidence of metronews.ru's status as major media was insufficient. The vc.ru pieces were self-authored promotional pieces, not published material 'about' the Petitioner. The research report was about trend forecasting findings and did not qualify as published material about the Petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The metronews.ru piece lacked an identifiable author separate from the publication, and evidence of metronews.ru's status as major media was insufficient. The vc.ru pieces were self-authored promotional pieces, not published material 'about' the Petitioner. The research report was about trend forecasting findings and did not qualify as published material about the Petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_03_B2203; source_row=31044 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the record fails to establish national importance, as the generalized industry reports do not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the record lacks sufficient detail on the scope of operations, planned hiring, and broader industry implications of his companies.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record fails to establish national importance, as the generalized industry reports do not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the record lacks sufficient detail on the scope of operations, planned hiring, and broader industry implications of his companies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_02_B5203; source_row=31041 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that interviewing respected artists does not establish distinguished reputation, the media and trade articles were not adequately explained as supporting distinguished reputation, and having content broadcast on television networks does not demonstrate the company is marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence because lesser production companies also have content broadcast.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that interviewing respected artists does not establish distinguished reputation, the media and trade articles were not adequately explained as supporting distinguished reputation, and having content broadcast on television networks does not demonstrate the company is marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence because lesser production companies also have content broadcast.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_02_B2203; source_row=31036 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not reassert it after the Director's RFE response, and did not contest the Director's findings or offer additional arguments on appeal. AAO treated the criterion as abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner initially claimed this criterion but did not reassert it after the Director's RFE response, and did not contest the Director's findings or offer additional arguments on appeal. AAO treated the criterion as abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-14_04_B2203; source_row=31053 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c