Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9061–9070
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner focused on requirements not cited in the Director's denial and failed to address the competitor-versus-coaching distinction, effectively abandoning or waiving this criterion on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner focused on requirements not cited in the Director's denial and failed to address the competitor-versus-coaching distinction, effectively abandoning or waiving this criterion on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-13_02_B2203; source_row=31022 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence lacked a required translation, the Petitioner failed to provide current viewership data, and the program's status as a local community newscast did not establish it as a major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence lacked a required translation, the Petitioner failed to provide current viewership data, and the program's status as a local community newscast did not establish it as a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-13_01_B2203; source_row=31012 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence requirements, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence requirements, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-13_01_B2203; source_row=31015 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he is well positioned. His master's degree is a positive factor but insufficient alone; his current position is temporary and the prospective position contingent; recommendation letters lack specificity about impact; citations are modest and not shown to reflect significant interest from relevant parties; NSF funding involvement was not as a named recipient or primary contact; a…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he is well positioned. His master's degree is a positive factor but insufficient alone; his current position is temporary and the prospective position contingent; recommendation letters lack specificity about impact; citations are modest and not shown to reflect significant interest from relevant parties; NSF funding involvement was not as a named recipient or primary contact; and peer review activity was not shown to represent a record of success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_02_B5203; source_row=31008 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's membership in the first organization expired before the Director's decision and the record does not show renewal, so continuous eligibility through adjudication was not established. Membership in the second organization began after the petition filing date and thus constitutes a new set of facts that cannot cure the deficiency. Neither membership satisfies the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's membership in the first organization expired before the Director's decision and the record does not show renewal, so continuous eligibility through adjudication was not established. Membership in the second organization began after the petition filing date and thus constitutes a new set of facts that cannot cure the deficiency. Neither membership satisfies the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_01_B5203; source_row=30995 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The article submitted does not qualify as a scholarly article because it appears intended for a general audience rather than learned persons in the field, and the Petitioner offered no arguments to the contrary.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The article submitted does not qualify as a scholarly article because it appears intended for a general audience rather than learned persons in the field, and the Petitioner offered no arguments to the contrary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_02_B2203; source_row=31002 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Two weeks of remuneration is insufficient to meet the Petitioner's burden under this criterion; foreign persons earning on a contract basis must provide sufficient evidence to calculate past earnings over a definite period, and a single two-week engagement falls short.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Two weeks of remuneration is insufficient to meet the Petitioner's burden under this criterion; foreign persons earning on a contract basis must provide sufficient evidence to calculate past earnings over a definite period, and a single two-week engagement falls short.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_02_B2203; source_row=31004 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Without bylaws or other official documentation of membership criteria, AAO cannot evaluate whether the claimed memberships are qualifying. AAO will not presume exclusive membership requirements from an association's general reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Without bylaws or other official documentation of membership criteria, AAO cannot evaluate whether the claimed memberships are qualifying. AAO will not presume exclusive membership requirements from an association's general reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_02_B2203; source_row=31000 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination - sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes that competitive BJJ acclaim does not equate to acclaim in law-enforcement training; the medal came from a belt-, age-, and weight-restricted division; recognition of the [REDACTED] course does not name or accrue to the Petitioner personally; success within his agency does not establish acclaim beyond it; and the Congressman's letter requests but does not show receipt of an award, and post-filing evidence cann…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes that competitive BJJ acclaim does not equate to acclaim in law-enforcement training; the medal came from a belt-, age-, and weight-restricted division; recognition of the [REDACTED] course does not name or accrue to the Petitioner personally; success within his agency does not establish acclaim beyond it; and the Congressman's letter requests but does not show receipt of an award, and post-filing evidence cannot retroactively establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_01_B2203; source_row=30991 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that considering the totality of the evidence, the Petitioner sufficiently demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance of his proposed endeavor, reversing the Director on the national importance portion.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that considering the totality of the evidence, the Petitioner sufficiently demonstrated both the substantial merit and national importance of his proposed endeavor, reversing the Director on the national importance portion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-09_02_B5203; source_row=31007 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c