Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9081–9090
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
While AAO agreed the tax return is for an individual (not a business), it found the return shows income from the Petitioner's role as a company owner/manager rather than as a Director of Photography, and without sufficient evidence that the compensation relates to his work in the field, no meaningful comparison to the submitted wage data was possible.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO agreed the tax return is for an individual (not a business), it found the return shows income from the Petitioner's role as a company owner/manager rather than as a Director of Photography, and without sufficient evidence that the compensation relates to his work in the field, no meaningful comparison to the submitted wage data was possible.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=30978 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that although the Petitioner was the recipient of the award, the record lacked evidence that the award was nationally or internationally recognized beyond the issuing entity, as there was no public reporting of its issuance or broader recognition in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that although the Petitioner was the recipient of the award, the record lacked evidence that the award was nationally or internationally recognized beyond the issuing entity, as there was no public reporting of its issuance or broader recognition in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=30984 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to corroborate his claimed U.S. hourly earnings, that USCIS policy prohibits converting foreign earnings to USD for comparison, and that comparison to average salary levels does not satisfy the requirement of showing earnings high relative to others in the field. Uncorroborated opinion letters were deemed insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to corroborate his claimed U.S. hourly earnings, that USCIS policy prohibits converting foreign earnings to USD for comparison, and that comparison to average salary levels does not satisfy the requirement of showing earnings high relative to others in the field. Uncorroborated opinion letters were deemed insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=30986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that at least one article was a press release rather than genuine published material, and the record lacked circulation statistics necessary to establish whether the outlets qualified as professional or major trade publications or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that at least one article was a press release rather than genuine published material, and the record lacked circulation statistics necessary to establish whether the outlets qualified as professional or major trade publications or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=30985 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor by founding a consulting company after the petition filing date, and post-filing facts (including the consulting company and the COVID-19 pandemic) cannot establish eligibility.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor by founding a consulting company after the petition filing date, and post-filing facts (including the consulting company and the COVID-19 pandemic) cannot establish eligibility. Even setting aside the consulting company, the record does not show that the Petitioner's IT project management work has national or global implications within the field or broader implications such as significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_01_B5203; source_row=30981 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor aimed at reducing pollution and minimizing environmental damage has substantial merit and is of national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor aimed at reducing pollution and minimizing environmental damage has substantial merit and is of national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_02_B5203; source_row=30988 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further discussion of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the second prong, making further discussion of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_02_B5203; source_row=30990 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On appeal, the Petitioner did not directly address this criterion, so AAO considered the claim abandoned. AAO independently noted that the evidence showed the commercial success of the Petitioner's artist client, not the Petitioner's own commercial success as a performing artist.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On appeal, the Petitioner did not directly address this criterion, so AAO considered the claim abandoned. AAO independently noted that the evidence showed the commercial success of the Petitioner's artist client, not the Petitioner's own commercial success as a performing artist.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=30979 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three criteria at step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=30980 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c