Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9121–9130
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the required three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion, making it unnecessary to reach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the required three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion, making it unnecessary to reach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-03_03_B2203; source_row=30933 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not formally conduct a final merits determination because the numerical threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not formally conduct a final merits determination because the numerical threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-03_03_B2203; source_row=30934 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate because it ignored the Petitioner's specific assertions regarding leadership at multiple organizations and lacked specific discussion of the supporting evidence, warranting remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate because it ignored the Petitioner's specific assertions regarding leadership at multiple organizations and lacked specific discussion of the supporting evidence, warranting remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=30941 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser national or international awards for excellence
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate because it lacked specific discussion of the Petitioner's assertions and evidence, and remanded for further consideration of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate because it lacked specific discussion of the Petitioner's assertions and evidence, and remanded for further consideration of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-03_04_B2203; source_row=30935 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's third-prong arguments were largely derivative of the first two prongs and did not independently address the waiver factors. The temporary nature of student/postdoc status is not a basis for permanent immigration benefits, and unlike the petitioner in Dhanasar, she had not initiated or played a key role in federally funded research.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's third-prong arguments were largely derivative of the first two prongs and did not independently address the waiver factors. The temporary nature of student/postdoc status is not a basis for permanent immigration benefits, and unlike the petitioner in Dhanasar, she had not initiated or played a key role in federally funded research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_04_B5203; source_row=30918 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's education was not shown to be related to her proposed endeavor, letters from colleagues were insufficiently detailed to establish a record of success, and certifications being obtained in the U.S. post-filing could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's education was not shown to be related to her proposed endeavor, letters from colleagues were insufficiently detailed to establish a record of success, and certifications being obtained in the U.S. post-filing could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_05_B5203; source_row=30920 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The photographs were undescribed and did not establish judging of others' work. The email correspondence lacked context about the Petitioner's role, and the translation was not a properly certified English translation as required by regulation, making the material unreliable.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The photographs were undescribed and did not establish judging of others' work. The email correspondence lacked context about the Petitioner's role, and the translation was not a properly certified English translation as required by regulation, making the material unreliable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B2203; source_row=30906 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Red Dot award was granted to the product and the designing company, not to the Petitioner personally. The printout named other designers but not the Petitioner. No evidence was submitted showing the Petitioner himself received the award, and insufficient information was provided about the award's eligibility requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Red Dot award was granted to the product and the designing company, not to the Petitioner personally. The printout named other designers but not the Petitioner. No evidence was submitted showing the Petitioner himself received the award, and insufficient information was provided about the award's eligibility requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B2203; source_row=30905 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor in her RFE response, which cannot retroactively establish eligibility. Even considering the consultancy plan, the generic business plan with modest revenue projections and minimal job creation (4 jobs including her own) did not show broader national implications or substantial positive economic effects rising to the level of national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor in her RFE response, which cannot retroactively establish eligibility. Even considering the consultancy plan, the generic business plan with modest revenue projections and minimal job creation (4 jobs including her own) did not show broader national implications or substantial positive economic effects rising to the level of national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B5203; source_row=30910 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c