Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9131–9140
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / EnergyMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion that the first Dhanasar prong was met and declined to elaborate further.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion that the first Dhanasar prong was met and declined to elaborate further.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_04_B5203; source_row=30916 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / EnergyMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the limited evidence of interest in the Petitioner's work was insufficient, noting that her citations related mostly to earlier unrelated research, the MedWin editorial board letter was unreliable, and at the time of filing she was still a graduate student not yet eligible for the postdoctoral position she proposed. The degree of interest her work attracted did not meet the Dhanasar standard.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the limited evidence of interest in the Petitioner's work was insufficient, noting that her citations related mostly to earlier unrelated research, the MedWin editorial board letter was unreliable, and at the time of filing she was still a graduate student not yet eligible for the postdoctoral position she proposed. The degree of interest her work attracted did not meet the Dhanasar standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_04_B5203; source_row=30917 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic EngineeringEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence regarding the global semiconductor market, U.S. industry, government initiatives, letters of support, and dissemination of results through publication demonstrated both substantial merit and national importance of his proposed research.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence regarding the global semiconductor market, U.S. industry, government initiatives, letters of support, and dissemination of results through publication demonstrated both substantial merit and national importance of his proposed research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_02_B5203; source_row=30913 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic EngineeringEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's considerable expertise in semiconductor research, documented past successes, and the significance of his work to U.S. technological interests collectively demonstrate that his contributions are of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even if other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's considerable expertise in semiconductor research, documented past successes, and the significance of his work to U.S. technological interests collectively demonstrate that his contributions are of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even if other qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_02_B5203; source_row=30915 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
FinanceBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's professional plan described only broad activities she could do based on past experience rather than a specific endeavor. She failed to show potential for significant economic impact or broader implications in the banking/financial advisory field, and her claims about national-level impacts were unsupported by sufficient detail.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's professional plan described only broad activities she could do based on past experience rather than a specific endeavor. She failed to show potential for significant economic impact or broader implications in the banking/financial advisory field, and her claims about national-level impacts were unsupported by sufficient detail.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_05_B5203; source_row=30919 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
H-1B support letters described the Petitioner's job duties but did not establish the level of his involvement in development or the significance of the product in the field. Descriptions of portable fusion and photographs of a machine were unexplained and insufficient to carry the Petitioner's burden.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
H-1B support letters described the Petitioner's job duties but did not establish the level of his involvement in development or the significance of the product in the field. Descriptions of portable fusion and photographs of a machine were unexplained and insufficient to carry the Petitioner's burden.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B2203; source_row=30907 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B2203; source_row=30908 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner holds a foreign bachelor's degree equivalent in mathematics and, based on employer letters, tax documentation, and other contemporaneous evidence, gained at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner holds a foreign bachelor's degree equivalent in mathematics and, based on employer letters, tax documentation, and other contemporaneous evidence, gained at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-02_01_B5203; source_row=30909 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the business plan lacked specificity about where financial analysts would work and where the 416 indirect jobs would be created. The letters of recommendation either addressed potential customer interest (relevant to prong 2, not prong 1) or the Petitioner's past performance rather than the proposed endeavor's national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the business plan lacked specificity about where financial analysts would work and where the 416 indirect jobs would be created. The letters of recommendation either addressed potential customer interest (relevant to prong 2, not prong 1) or the Petitioner's past performance rather than the proposed endeavor's national importance. Opinion letters merely repeated the business plan and asserted importance of the field generally rather than addressing the specific endeavor. Generalized STEM articles similarly did not address the specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-02-01_01_B5203; source_row=30886 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c