Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9221–9230
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even considering the additional letters the Acting Director overlooked, the documented experience totals less than ten years, only one letter states full-time employment, and overlapping dates create unresolved inconsistencies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even considering the additional letters the Acting Director overlooked, the documented experience totals less than ten years, only one letter states full-time employment, and overlapping dates create unresolved inconsistencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-17_02_B5203; source_row=30766 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record (degree relating to area of exceptional ability)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the diplomas were not shown to relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability and no academic transcripts or supporting evidence were submitted on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the diplomas were not shown to relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability and no academic transcripts or supporting evidence were submitted on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-17_02_B5203; source_row=30765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree professional via baccalaureate plus five years progressive experience in the specialty
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that without an identified specialty, the record cannot establish whether the Petitioner's post-baccalaureate experience meets the regulatory requirement. The Petitioner's pivot to the trucking company introduced impermissible new facts post-filing, and his original healthcare-products endeavor was never adequately defined.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that without an identified specialty, the record cannot establish whether the Petitioner's post-baccalaureate experience meets the regulatory requirement. The Petitioner's pivot to the trucking company introduced impermissible new facts post-filing, and his original healthcare-products endeavor was never adequately defined.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=30761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Articles discussing the Petitioner and his property did not mention the two companies, and therefore did not demonstrate their distinguished reputations. Post-petition press releases and articles could not establish eligibility. The limited information in business journal coverage was insufficient to show a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Articles discussing the Petitioner and his property did not mention the two companies, and therefore did not demonstrate their distinguished reputations. Post-petition press releases and articles could not establish eligibility. The limited information in business journal coverage was insufficient to show a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=30753 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The documentation for the primary organization did not show that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The second membership post-dated the petition filing and therefore could not be used to establish eligibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The documentation for the primary organization did not show that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The second membership post-dated the petition filing and therefore could not be used to establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=30749 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The award's coverage was limited to a few community-oriented newspapers, and there was no evidence demonstrating national or international recognition of the award in the field. The award also appeared limited to a specific demographic group, undermining its standing as a field-wide recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The award's coverage was limited to a few community-oriented newspapers, and there was no evidence demonstrating national or international recognition of the award in the field. The award also appeared limited to a specific demographic group, undermining its standing as a field-wide recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=30748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not point to specific evidence in the record and the phrase 'a judge' implies a formal designation in a judging capacity. Performing managerial responsibilities does not constitute participation as a judge of the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not point to specific evidence in the record and the phrase 'a judge' implies a formal designation in a judging capacity. Performing managerial responsibilities does not constitute participation as a judge of the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=30751 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's patient care and teaching activities, while meritorious, lacked demonstrated national importance. Recommendation letters praised her individual skills but did not show broader impact. Reliance on the general nursing shortage was insufficient without evidence of how her specific work would resolve or materially impact that shortage.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's patient care and teaching activities, while meritorious, lacked demonstrated national importance. Recommendation letters praised her individual skills but did not show broader impact. Reliance on the general nursing shortage was insufficient without evidence of how her specific work would resolve or materially impact that shortage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B5203; source_row=30755 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue because the step-one threshold was not met, but noted in an advisory comment that the record as a whole does not support a finding of the required acclaim and recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because the step-one threshold was not met, but noted in an advisory comment that the record as a whole does not support a finding of the required acclaim and recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=30754 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c