Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 9251–9260

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementPhysician

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputations

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that letters of endorsement from employers and colleagues—attesting to contributions to successful ad campaigns, development of a breakthrough marketing tool, and winning major new accounts—demonstrated the Beneficiary made a significant impact on organizations with distinguished reputations in advertising and technology, satisfying this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that letters of endorsement from employers and colleagues—attesting to contributions to successful ad campaigns, development of a breakthrough marketing tool, and winning major new accounts—demonstrated the Beneficiary made a significant impact on organizations with distinguished reputations in advertising and technology, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_02_B2203; source_row=30713
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

What the decision said

Although uncontested on appeal, AAO directed the Director to review the evidence submitted in support of this criterion on remand because the denial similarly failed to analyze the totality of the evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although uncontested on appeal, AAO directed the Director to review the evidence submitted in support of this criterion on remand because the denial similarly failed to analyze the totality of the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the individual

What the decision said

AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and incomplete, failing to acknowledge documentation regarding circulation. AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the criterion was met at the time of filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis was conclusory and incomplete, failing to acknowledge documentation regarding circulation. AAO remanded for the Director to determine whether the criterion was met at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

What the decision said

AAO found the Director failed to address initial evidence and one of the Petitioner's membership claims, and remanded for re-examination of the evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to address initial evidence and one of the Petitioner's membership claims, and remanded for re-examination of the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30697
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

What the decision said

AAO found the Director made a conclusory determination without addressing the Petitioner's activities with one of the claimed organizations, and remanded for review based on the totality of evidence.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director made a conclusory determination without addressing the Petitioner's activities with one of the claimed organizations, and remanded for review based on the totality of evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30699
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO agreed it was difficult to discern what specific evidence the Director considered, and remanded for re-examination of the Petitioner's claims and all supporting evidence.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed it was difficult to discern what specific evidence the Director considered, and remanded for re-examination of the Petitioner's claims and all supporting evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical roles

What the decision said

AAO found the Director failed to address the primary claim and the supporting evidence regarding the organizations' distinguished reputations, and remanded for re-examination.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to address the primary claim and the supporting evidence regarding the organizations' distinguished reputations, and remanded for re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_01_B2203; source_row=30701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Initial evidence — at least three of six criteria

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met three of the six evidentiary criteria.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner met three of the six evidentiary criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_03_B5203; source_row=30716
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

Final merits determination — degree of expertise significantly above ordinary

What the decision said

Because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's specific final merits findings on appeal, AAO deemed those findings waived and affirmed the denial on that basis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's specific final merits findings on appeal, AAO deemed those findings waived and affirmed the denial on that basis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_03_B5203; source_row=30717
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive failures on the first and second prongs rendered further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the dispositive failures on the first and second prongs rendered further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-10_04_B5203; source_row=30731
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment