Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed: military medals acknowledge service as a military officer but do not reflect recognition for significant contributions in military instruction, entrepreneurship, or sales. The letters described completion of administrative tasks, not recognition for significant contributions to the relevant fields.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed: military medals acknowledge service as a military officer but do not reflect recognition for significant contributions in military instruction, entrepreneurship, or sales. The letters described completion of administrative tasks, not recognition for significant contributions to the relevant fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-06_01_B5203; source_row=30689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
None of the Petitioner's cited materials on appeal constitutes scholarly articles published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Manuscripts under revision are unpublished, patents are not scholarly articles, a bare assertion that a dissertation was published does not demonstrate it was in qualifying media, and conference presentations are not supported by corroborating evidence.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
None of the Petitioner's cited materials on appeal constitutes scholarly articles published in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Manuscripts under revision are unpublished, patents are not scholarly articles, a bare assertion that a dissertation was published does not demonstrate it was in qualifying media, and conference presentations are not supported by corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_01_B2203; source_row=30666 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not establish that the Petitioner led or performed a critical role at any of the identified organizations (the universities or school district), nor that any of those organizations have a distinguished reputation through documented eminence or excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record does not establish that the Petitioner led or performed a critical role at any of the identified organizations (the universities or school district), nor that any of those organizations have a distinguished reputation through documented eminence or excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_01_B2203; source_row=30667 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contains no comparative salary data for others in the field; the union contract shows only a minimum salary, not that the Petitioner earned the highest allowed; and a post-filing offer letter for a 'Scientist III' role at $68,000 does not establish that salary is high relative to others in that field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains no comparative salary data for others in the field; the union contract shows only a minimum salary, not that the Petitioner earned the highest allowed; and a post-filing offer letter for a 'Scientist III' role at $68,000 does not establish that salary is high relative to others in that field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_01_B2203; source_row=30668 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even accepting the AAAS and ACTE as preeminent associations, the plain language of the criterion requires that membership associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts. The Petitioner did not assert and the record does not support that either organization imposes such a requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even accepting the AAAS and ACTE as preeminent associations, the plain language of the criterion requires that membership associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts. The Petitioner did not assert and the record does not support that either organization imposes such a requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_01_B2203; source_row=30664 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was neither clearly defined nor nationally important. The initial description of working as a treasurer/controller for unidentified companies lacked national scope, and the later-introduced wallpaper company and real estate activities were inconsistent with and contradicted the original proposed endeavor, preventing a finding of national importance for any single endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was neither clearly defined nor nationally important. The initial description of working as a treasurer/controller for unidentified companies lacked national scope, and the later-introduced wallpaper company and real estate activities were inconsistent with and contradicted the original proposed endeavor, preventing a finding of national importance for any single endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_02_B5203; source_row=30674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director's reliance on EDGE was based on the wrong credential ('titulo de master' rather than 'master universitario'), requiring remand for reconsideration with the correct information.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's reliance on EDGE was based on the wrong credential ('titulo de master' rather than 'master universitario'), requiring remand for reconsideration with the correct information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_03_B5203; source_row=30677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed on appeal that national importance was not established, and on this second motion to reopen found that the petitioner still submitted no new facts or documentary evidence sufficient to overcome this deficiency.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed on appeal that national importance was not established, and on this second motion to reopen found that the petitioner still submitted no new facts or documentary evidence sufficient to overcome this deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_01_B5203; source_row=30671 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the cybersecurity field has national importance, the Petitioner did not connect her specific proposed endeavor as a business development manager within a single company's cybersecurity sales department to national initiatives. The economic projections lacked methodological foundation, and the EIA merely extrapolated figures the Petitioner herself supplied without independent verification.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the cybersecurity field has national importance, the Petitioner did not connect her specific proposed endeavor as a business development manager within a single company's cybersecurity sales department to national initiatives. The economic projections lacked methodological foundation, and the EIA merely extrapolated figures the Petitioner herself supplied without independent verification. Even accepting the projections, the Petitioner did not show how benefits would accrue to the national economy rather than to the companies involved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-01-05_04_B5203; source_row=30679 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c