Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
H.14 specific skills and 24 months experience as Sr. PHP Developer or related
What the decision said
AAO agreed with the Director's analysis and additionally found the Petitioner waived the issue by failing to address it on appeal, which alone disposes of the appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's analysis and additionally found the Petitioner waived the issue by failing to address it on appeal, which alone disposes of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-27_01_B5203; source_row=30615 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that none of the six forms of evidence satisfied all of the criterion's requirements. The Billboard Venezuela article could not be verified and lacked a proper translation. The Iberoeconomía article lacked an author and a certified translation. The Factores de Poder articles lacked adequate circulation comparison evidence. The El Universal content was merely an advertisement, not published material.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that none of the six forms of evidence satisfied all of the criterion's requirements. The Billboard Venezuela article could not be verified and lacked a proper translation. The Iberoeconomía article lacked an author and a certified translation. The Factores de Poder articles lacked adequate circulation comparison evidence. The El Universal content was merely an advertisement, not published material. The Vive TV interview lacked viewership comparisons and was not properly translated. YouTube availability alone does not constitute major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-23_01_B2203; source_row=30605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record did not corroborate the Petitioner's receipt of the specified awards with primary evidence, and that the submitted media coverage lacked sufficient nexus to his specific awards to demonstrate national or international recognition. The testimonial letter alone was insufficient to meet the burden of proof.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not corroborate the Petitioner's receipt of the specified awards with primary evidence, and that the submitted media coverage lacked sufficient nexus to his specific awards to demonstrate national or international recognition. The testimonial letter alone was insufficient to meet the burden of proof.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-23_01_B2203; source_row=30604 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Director found substantial merit established but not national importance. AAO agreed that the Petitioner's general background materials about software development, ERP systems, STEM, and small businesses, plus his work for three local clients, did not show his specific endeavor would impact the field broadly. The proposed endeavor also materially changed after filing.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Director found substantial merit established but not national importance. AAO agreed that the Petitioner's general background materials about software development, ERP systems, STEM, and small businesses, plus his work for three local clients, did not show his specific endeavor would impact the field broadly. The proposed endeavor also materially changed after filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-23_01_B5203; source_row=30611 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor lacks national importance because the record does not establish how the Petitioner's jewelry production and sales will have national or global implications within his field, and general assertions about economic or cultural benefits were not corroborated by specific data or documentation.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor lacks national importance because the record does not establish how the Petitioner's jewelry production and sales will have national or global implications within his field, and general assertions about economic or cultural benefits were not corroborated by specific data or documentation. Letters of recommendation praised the Petitioner's qualifications but did not explain how his specific endeavor would impact or benefit the industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-22_02_B5203; source_row=30601 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concurred that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. While acknowledging the U.S. reliance on the oil industry and the potential productivity benefits of the Petitioner's work, AAO found no sufficient evidence connecting his specific endeavor to national-level economic impact, job creation, or broader implications for the field.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. While acknowledging the U.S. reliance on the oil industry and the potential productivity benefits of the Petitioner's work, AAO found no sufficient evidence connecting his specific endeavor to national-level economic impact, job creation, or broader implications for the field. Letters of recommendation spoke generally about the industry without explaining how the Petitioner's particular endeavor would advance or impact it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-22_01_B5203; source_row=30598 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c