Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9371–9380
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-09_01_B2203; source_row=30542 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherMaster’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to adequately argue on appeal how his submitted evidence satisfied this criterion, effectively abandoning his claims. Even on brief review, the evidence showed impacts on individual projects rather than the broader field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to adequately argue on appeal how his submitted evidence satisfied this criterion, effectively abandoning his claims. Even on brief review, the evidence showed impacts on individual projects rather than the broader field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-09_01_B2203; source_row=30538 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concurred that the Petitioner's endeavor—operating as president of a freight transportation company he founded—benefits the company, its clients, and customers, but does not establish national or global implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred that the Petitioner's endeavor—operating as president of a freight transportation company he founded—benefits the company, its clients, and customers, but does not establish national or global implications. The business plan lacks sufficient detail supporting financial and staffing projections, the industry reports do not refer to the Petitioner or his specific endeavor, and the expert letter is overly vague and conclusory without independent analysis establishing national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-08_01_B5203; source_row=30534 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed merit existed in the area of culture but found the Petitioner failed to show prospective national impact. Reference letters described past local volunteer activities rather than prospective impact, the business plan lacked revenue/job projections, and the case was distinguishable from Matter of E-C-H-.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed merit existed in the area of culture but found the Petitioner failed to show prospective national impact. Reference letters described past local volunteer activities rather than prospective impact, the business plan lacked revenue/job projections, and the case was distinguishable from Matter of E-C-H-.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_01_B5203; source_row=30526 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
holds advanced degree or foreign equivalent above baccalaureate
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Beneficiary's Indian master's degrees each equate only to a U.S. baccalaureate and thus he does not hold a foreign degree equivalent above a baccalaureate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's Indian master's degrees each equate only to a U.S. baccalaureate and thus he does not hold a foreign degree equivalent above a baccalaureate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_02_B5203; source_row=30531 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
baccalaureate plus five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that only one employer's letter (approximately 2 years 4 months) satisfied regulatory requirements; the petitioner's own experience cannot count, and the remaining letters were deficient in detail or missing required elements, thus failing to establish five years of qualifying progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that only one employer's letter (approximately 2 years 4 months) satisfied regulatory requirements; the petitioner's own experience cannot count, and the remaining letters were deficient in detail or missing required elements, thus failing to establish five years of qualifying progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_02_B5203; source_row=30532 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets minimum educational requirements of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed the Director's reliance on EDGE, finding the petitioner's evaluations inconsistent and unpersuasive. Each Indian master's program required only a three-year baccalaureate for admission and each represents no more than a U.S. baccalaureate level of attainment. Arguments about combined credits, Ph.D. entry eligibility, and U.S. program admissibility were all rejected.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's reliance on EDGE, finding the petitioner's evaluations inconsistent and unpersuasive. Each Indian master's program required only a three-year baccalaureate for admission and each represents no more than a U.S. baccalaureate level of attainment. Arguments about combined credits, Ph.D. entry eligibility, and U.S. program admissibility were all rejected.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_02_B5203; source_row=30530 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that ability to pay was established for 2012. The Petitioner paid the Beneficiary $13,820 less than the proffered wage in 2012, and failed to submit any of the required forms of evidence (annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements) for that year. The 2012 balance sheet was unaudited and the bank statements were incomplete.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that ability to pay was established for 2012. The Petitioner paid the Beneficiary $13,820 less than the proffered wage in 2012, and failed to submit any of the required forms of evidence (annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements) for that year. The 2012 balance sheet was unaudited and the bank statements were incomplete. AAO also raised the additional issue of multiple I-140 beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_02_B5203; source_row=30533 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable conclusion, finding the legal degree did not bear on the non-legal endeavor, the record lacked evidence of entrepreneurial or educational experience and success, the Petitioner's involvement with his spouse's projects was not specified, and there were no projections or evidence showing sufficient interest from potential customers.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable conclusion, finding the legal degree did not bear on the non-legal endeavor, the record lacked evidence of entrepreneurial or educational experience and success, the Petitioner's involvement with his spouse's projects was not specified, and there were no projections or evidence showing sufficient interest from potential customers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-12-07_01_B5203; source_row=30527 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c