Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found inconsistencies among the employment letters, résumé, and ETA regarding job titles and companies, noted the self-employment letter was from an outsourced accountant without authority to speak to work duties, and found a lack of corroborating evidence such as client contracts or payments. No letter confirmed full-time status or adequately described IT-related duties.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found inconsistencies among the employment letters, résumé, and ETA regarding job titles and companies, noted the self-employment letter was from an outsourced accountant without authority to speak to work duties, and found a lack of corroborating evidence such as client contracts or payments. No letter confirmed full-time status or adequately described IT-related duties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-07_02_B5203; source_row=30372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing degree or diploma
Why the evidence was persuasive
Although the Title of Technologist is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree for advanced-degree purposes, it constitutes an official academic record showing a degree or similar award from an institution of learning relating to the area of claimed exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Title of Technologist is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree for advanced-degree purposes, it constitutes an official academic record showing a degree or similar award from an institution of learning relating to the area of claimed exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-07_02_B5203; source_row=30371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The recommendation letters described project results for individual clients but did not establish that the Petitioner received recognition for significant contributions to the IT industry or field. The reference materials discussed the importance of the field generally without mentioning the Petitioner. Merely working in an important field is insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters described project results for individual clients but did not establish that the Petitioner received recognition for significant contributions to the IT industry or field. The reference materials discussed the importance of the field generally without mentioning the Petitioner. Merely working in an important field is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-07_02_B5203; source_row=30376 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO finds substantial merit likely satisfied but national importance is not. The therapy work benefits a limited number of patients; industry-wide importance does not establish national importance of the specific endeavor; and the late-filed business plan is a material change with negligible evidentiary weight.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds substantial merit likely satisfied but national importance is not. The therapy work benefits a limited number of patients; industry-wide importance does not establish national importance of the specific endeavor; and the late-filed business plan is a material change with negligible evidentiary weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-04_01_B5203; source_row=30351 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence failed to show national importance. The Petitioner's qualifications and the general importance of the IT field are insufficient; what matters is the specific proposed endeavor's broader impact. The letters of recommendation and economic arguments did not establish a direct connection to national-level impacts such as economic shifts or job creation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the evidence failed to show national importance. The Petitioner's qualifications and the general importance of the IT field are insufficient; what matters is the specific proposed endeavor's broader impact. The letters of recommendation and economic arguments did not establish a direct connection to national-level impacts such as economic shifts or job creation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-04_03_B5203; source_row=30357 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The presidential memoranda confirm the oil and gas industry's importance but do not address the Petitioner's specific recruitment consulting activities or their impact. The relevant inquiry under Dhanasar is the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, not the field generally, and the new evidence does not bridge that gap.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The presidential memoranda confirm the oil and gas industry's importance but do not address the Petitioner's specific recruitment consulting activities or their impact. The relevant inquiry under Dhanasar is the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, not the field generally, and the new evidence does not bridge that gap.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-04_02_B5203; source_row=30354 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirms the misrepresentation findings; the Beneficiary submitted no corroborating evidence and waived the recruitment and employee-count issues by failing to address them on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirms the misrepresentation findings; the Beneficiary submitted no corroborating evidence and waived the recruitment and employee-count issues by failing to address them on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-11-04_04_B5203; source_row=30362 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c