Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion regarding authorship of scholarly articles on appeal, and therefore waived appeal on that issue.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion regarding authorship of scholarly articles on appeal, and therefore waived appeal on that issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-28_01_B2203; source_row=30300 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO noted that the Petitioner's knowledge, skills, and experience relate to the second prong but did not conduct further analysis because prong one was dispositive.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's knowledge, skills, and experience relate to the second prong but did not conduct further analysis because prong one was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-28_01_B5203; source_row=30304 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the advanced-degree requirement was not met but on a different basis: since dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree, the regulation does not allow a combination of education and experience to substitute, and the credential evaluator did not actually claim the Petitioner holds a foreign equivalent doctorate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the advanced-degree requirement was not met but on a different basis: since dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree, the regulation does not allow a combination of education and experience to substitute, and the credential evaluator did not actually claim the Petitioner holds a foreign equivalent doctorate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-27_02_B5203; source_row=30293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found Petitioner's evidence focused on her own credentials and the importance of nursing generally, rather than on the specific endeavor's broader impact. Recommendation letters and industry reports did not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner's evidence focused on her own credentials and the importance of nursing generally, rather than on the specific endeavor's broader impact. Recommendation letters and industry reports did not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-27_01_B5203; source_row=30290 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner did not challenge the Director's exceptional-ability finding on appeal, AAO treated the issue as waived and affirmed the denial on this ground.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner did not challenge the Director's exceptional-ability finding on appeal, AAO treated the issue as waived and affirmed the denial on this ground.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-27_02_B5203; source_row=30294 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO reserved this prong because the NIW issue was moot given failure to establish EB-2 eligibility, but noted the record does not show national importance as the proposed endeavor would not sufficiently impact U.S. interests or the dental industry more broadly.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this prong because the NIW issue was moot given failure to establish EB-2 eligibility, but noted the record does not show national importance as the proposed endeavor would not sufficiently impact U.S. interests or the dental industry more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-27_02_B5203; source_row=30295 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the reference letters clearly explained how the Petitioner's contributions are of major significance and their impact on the field and on the authors' own work, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the reference letters clearly explained how the Petitioner's contributions are of major significance and their impact on the field and on the authors' own work, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-27_01_B2203; source_row=30289 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIPhysician2,011 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate as an advisory matter and found it did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the record in the aggregate as an advisory matter and found it did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=30276 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the record supported that the Petitioner performed a leading role at one company and a critical role at another, he failed to establish that either organization had a distinguished reputation 'marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.' The evidence of awards and recognitions did not sufficiently demonstrate the significance or the companies' standing relative to comparable organizations in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the record supported that the Petitioner performed a leading role at one company and a critical role at another, he failed to establish that either organization had a distinguished reputation 'marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.' The evidence of awards and recognitions did not sufficiently demonstrate the significance or the companies' standing relative to comparable organizations in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=30274 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c