Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences958 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but observed in dicta that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but observed in dicta that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-25_01_B2203; source_row=30267 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record shows that liver transplantation research has substantial merit (important treatment option for chronic liver failure) and national importance (limited availability of suitable livers is a national issue that organ preservation research addresses).
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The record shows that liver transplantation research has substantial merit (important treatment option for chronic liver failure) and national importance (limited availability of suitable livers is a national issue that organ preservation research addresses).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-25_01_B5203; source_row=30268 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that the Pilot Union qualifies as a 'professional' association, since the record did not show its membership comprises individuals holding a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that the Pilot Union qualifies as a 'professional' association, since the record did not show its membership comprises individuals holding a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-24_01_B5203; source_row=30256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the substantive final merits question; it concluded the Director's analysis was inadequate because it failed to weigh the totality of the evidence and remanded for a new decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the substantive final merits question; it concluded the Director's analysis was inadequate because it failed to weigh the totality of the evidence and remanded for a new decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-24_02_B2101; source_row=30262 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The submitted certificates were not shown to be official academic records, did not show award of a degree/diploma/certificate, and the issuing entities were not shown to qualify as a college, university, school, or other institution of learning.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted certificates were not shown to be official academic records, did not show award of a degree/diploma/certificate, and the issuing entities were not shown to qualify as a college, university, school, or other institution of learning.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-24_01_B5203; source_row=30252 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The work certificate did not specify whether the Petitioner's employment was full-time, and thus did not establish at least ten years of full-time experience as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The work certificate did not specify whether the Petitioner's employment was full-time, and thus did not establish at least ten years of full-time experience as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-24_01_B5203; source_row=30253 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Proposed work falls within a designated statutory field
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that being a lawyer does not automatically bar extraordinary ability classification; what matters is whether the proposed work falls within a statutory field. The record demonstrated that the Petitioner's proposed employment was in the field of business, based on her stated basis for the petition, the authors of supporting letters, and press coverage of her work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that being a lawyer does not automatically bar extraordinary ability classification; what matters is whether the proposed work falls within a statutory field. The record demonstrated that the Petitioner's proposed employment was in the field of business, based on her stated basis for the petition, the authors of supporting letters, and press coverage of her work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-24_01_B2101; source_row=30251 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that first authorship, modest citation counts, awards limited to trainees, letters offering only measured praise, superficial media coverage, and a post-filing-date NCCN citation collectively failed to establish that the Petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim or occupies the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that first authorship, modest citation counts, awards limited to trainees, letters offering only measured praise, superficial media coverage, and a post-filing-date NCCN citation collectively failed to establish that the Petitioner has sustained national or international acclaim or occupies the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-21_01_B2203; source_row=30249 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c