Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO implicitly accepted the academic record criterion as met, as the decision identifies only one criterion as met overall, though the final conclusion on which single criterion was met is somewhat ambiguous.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO implicitly accepted the academic record criterion as met, as the decision identifies only one criterion as met overall, though the final conclusion on which single criterion was met is somewhat ambiguous.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=30152 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the registration had expired before the petition was filed and therefore could not serve as valid evidence of professional association membership at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the registration had expired before the petition was filed and therefore could not serve as valid evidence of professional association membership at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=30154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
License or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the identity card did not demonstrate what qualified the Petitioner to obtain it or what it conferred, and the registration had expired before the petition was filed in May 2019, making neither document valid at time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the identity card did not demonstrate what qualified the Petitioner to obtain it or what it conferred, and the registration had expired before the petition was filed in May 2019, making neither document valid at time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=30153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other600 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that despite reference letters, guideline citations, ACC website postings, and aggregate citation counts, the Petitioner did not establish that his work had a major impact on the field. The letters lacked specificity, the paper was only one of 786 cited in the guideline, citation figures were not shown to be unusually high, and ACC postings did not demonstrate endorsement.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that despite reference letters, guideline citations, ACC website postings, and aggregate citation counts, the Petitioner did not establish that his work had a major impact on the field. The letters lacked specificity, the paper was only one of 786 cited in the guideline, citation figures were not shown to be unusually high, and ACC postings did not demonstrate endorsement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=30145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not separately re-adjudicate prong 2 on motion; it noted that several pieces of new evidence (purchase orders, bank statements, business commencement) related more to prong 2 than to prong 1's national-importance question.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately re-adjudicate prong 2 on motion; it noted that several pieces of new evidence (purchase orders, bank statements, business commencement) related more to prong 2 than to prong 1's national-importance question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=30149 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
remuneration for services demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO added that the salary data from the Brazilian website lacked a required English translation, and covered 2017–2018 while the Petitioner's own salary evidence covered 2012–2015, so the data did not correlate to the relevant years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO added that the salary data from the Brazilian website lacked a required English translation, and covered 2017–2018 while the Petitioner's own salary evidence covered 2012–2015, so the data did not correlate to the relevant years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30138 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the registration document did not demonstrate membership in a professional association because it was issued merely upon meeting financial obligations and having no disciplinary actions, with no indication professional qualifications were considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the registration document did not demonstrate membership in a professional association because it was issued merely upon meeting financial obligations and having no disciplinary actions, with no indication professional qualifications were considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30139 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
Considering the totality of evidence, the importance and potential of the endeavor combined with her qualifications and past success establish that her contributions will benefit the U.S. even if qualified workers are available.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Considering the totality of evidence, the importance and potential of the endeavor combined with her qualifications and past success establish that her contributions will benefit the U.S. even if qualified workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=30133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c