Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9651–9660
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
Petitioner's detailed statement of endeavor, citation history, news article on her research, and supporting articles established that her research has national/global implications.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's detailed statement of endeavor, citation history, news article on her research, and supporting articles established that her research has national/global implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=30131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
Petitioner's education, knowledge, examples of future research with details on progress, and supporting letters from professional/academic acquaintances corroborated her position to advance the endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's education, knowledge, examples of future research with details on progress, and supporting letters from professional/academic acquaintances corroborated her position to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_01_B5203; source_row=30132 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification for the profession (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the documents had expired before adjudication, related only to administration rather than financial management, and the identity card was not shown to be required to practice the profession since the Petitioner worked approximately ten years without it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the documents had expired before adjudication, related only to administration rather than financial management, and the identity card was not shown to be required to practice the profession since the Petitioner worked approximately ten years without it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30137 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – exceptional ability
What the decision said
Because AAO found the Petitioner did not meet at least three of the six evidentiary criteria, it did not need to reach a final merits determination; it nevertheless endorsed the Director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because AAO found the Petitioner did not meet at least three of the six evidentiary criteria, it did not need to reach a final merits determination; it nevertheless endorsed the Director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30140 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the academic record insufficient because the Petitioner's education was in administration, not financial management, and he had not documented how the two fields are related.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the academic record insufficient because the Petitioner's education was in administration, not financial management, and he had not documented how the two fields are related.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30135 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director and added that the Petitioner remained in the same position throughout his employment, undermining progressiveness, and the record does not establish he ever worked as a financial manager.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director and added that the Petitioner remained in the same position throughout his employment, undermining progressiveness, and the record does not establish he ever worked as a financial manager.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director and noted that a new employer letter submitted with the RFE response described the Petitioner's work as administrative, not financial management, and there was no independent objective evidence of experience as a financial manager.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director and noted that a new employer letter submitted with the RFE response described the Petitioner's work as administrative, not financial management, and there was no independent objective evidence of experience as a financial manager.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-04_02_B5203; source_row=30136 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on his service on multiple Ph.D. dissertation committees evaluating candidates' doctoral work in Law, which falls within an allied field of specialization.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner satisfied the judging criterion based on his service on multiple Ph.D. dissertation committees evaluating candidates' doctoral work in Law, which falls within an allied field of specialization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-10-03_01_B2203; source_row=30122 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c