Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director failed to consider much of the evidence and remanded for a full re-examination of all submitted claims and evidence.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director failed to consider much of the evidence and remanded for a full re-examination of all submitted claims and evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate and conclusory, noting the Director's discussion mirrored the RFE language despite additional evidence having been submitted, and remanded for a full analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate and conclusory, noting the Director's discussion mirrored the RFE language despite additional evidence having been submitted, and remanded for a full analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30065 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's analysis conclusory, failing to engage with specific evidence, and remanded with instructions to re-examine including accompanying explanatory letters.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's analysis conclusory, failing to engage with specific evidence, and remanded with instructions to re-examine including accompanying explanatory letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30066 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted the Director failed entirely to evaluate this criterion despite the Petitioner's claim and supporting evidence, and remanded with instructions to review the record including supplemental appeal evidence.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director failed entirely to evaluate this criterion despite the Petitioner's claim and supporting evidence, and remanded with instructions to review the record including supplemental appeal evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30068 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
What the decision said
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted her claimed occupation as an entrepreneur, and noted the Director's analysis again mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence in the RFE response. The matter was remanded for re-examination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that the Director should not have discounted her claimed occupation as an entrepreneur, and noted the Director's analysis again mirrored the RFE despite additional evidence in the RFE response. The matter was remanded for re-examination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=30071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding of national importance, concluding that the documentation predominantly related to past research activities rather than future plans, that recommendation letters demonstrated little knowledge of the Petitioner's work since he left academia, and that the record lacked sufficient evidence establishing a direct connection between the Petitioner's prospective research and the broader national…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding of national importance, concluding that the documentation predominantly related to past research activities rather than future plans, that recommendation letters demonstrated little knowledge of the Petitioner's work since he left academia, and that the record lacked sufficient evidence establishing a direct connection between the Petitioner's prospective research and the broader national implications claimed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-21_01_B5203; source_row=30059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c