Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9731–9740
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's substantial Instagram following (over 250,000 followers retained even after her 'bursts' of popularity subsided), media coverage, and judging role at a major national convention collectively established sustained national or international acclaim by a preponderance of the evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's substantial Instagram following (over 250,000 followers retained even after her 'bursts' of popularity subsided), media coverage, and judging role at a major national convention collectively established sustained national or international acclaim by a preponderance of the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-19_01_B2203; source_row=30040 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the final merits analysis was lacking, as the Director failed to consider the totality of the evidence. AAO remanded for a new decision that fully analyzes all evidence, including expert letters, membership evidence, and evidence of roles and contributions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the final merits analysis was lacking, as the Director failed to consider the totality of the evidence. AAO remanded for a new decision that fully analyzes all evidence, including expert letters, membership evidence, and evidence of roles and contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-16_01_B2203; source_row=30024 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations that require outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner represented his employers on the boards of associations whose members are companies rather than individuals, and thus did not personally qualify as a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner represented his employers on the boards of associations whose members are companies rather than individuals, and thus did not personally qualify as a member of an association requiring outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-16_02_B2203; source_row=30026 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director failed to consider the full record, particularly the Petitioner's role in reshaping the industry through major negotiations, media coverage including a major TV network, participation in high-profile forums alongside a sitting minister, and his board positions indicating stature in the field. Taken together, this evidence established eligibility by a preponderance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to consider the full record, particularly the Petitioner's role in reshaping the industry through major negotiations, media coverage including a major TV network, participation in high-profile forums alongside a sitting minister, and his board positions indicating stature in the field. Taken together, this evidence established eligibility by a preponderance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-16_02_B2203; source_row=30032 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the book and social media posts featuring the Petitioner's photographs were not about him, as he was merely one of about 60 credited contributors and was not the principal subject. Video and podcast appearances appeared to be promotional in nature due to brand ambassador relationships.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the book and social media posts featuring the Petitioner's photographs were not about him, as he was merely one of about 60 credited contributors and was not the principal subject. Video and podcast appearances appeared to be promotional in nature due to brand ambassador relationships. The Petitioner did not provide transcripts of interviews and did not establish that the media outlets qualify as major trade publications or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=30006 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the invoices showed studio billing rates rather than the Petitioner's personal salary, because the packages included expenses for second photographers, albums, and prints. The Petitioner did not document how much of the total fee he personally received, making comparison to salary survey data impossible.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the invoices showed studio billing rates rather than the Petitioner's personal salary, because the packages included expenses for second photographers, albums, and prints. The Petitioner did not document how much of the total fee he personally received, making comparison to salary survey data impossible.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=30010 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that recognition must extend beyond the awarding entities themselves, and that assertions by the organization about its own reputation do not suffice. The submitted evidence consisted largely of the organization's own website and promotional materials, without independent corroboration of national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that recognition must extend beyond the awarding entities themselves, and that assertions by the organization about its own reputation do not suffice. The submitted evidence consisted largely of the organization's own website and promotional materials, without independent corroboration of national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-15_01_B2203; source_row=30004 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c