Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 9751–9760
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the high remuneration criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the high remuneration criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_03_B2203; source_row=30001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but offered an advisory observation that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but offered an advisory observation that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_03_B2203; source_row=30003 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_01_B2203; source_row=29987 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner meets this criterion based on his receipt of medals at IBJJF World and Brazilian National Championship events.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner meets this criterion based on his receipt of medals at IBJJF World and Brazilian National Championship events.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_01_B2203; source_row=29982 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner meets the judging criterion based on his documented participation as a referee for jiu-jitsu competitions.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner meets the judging criterion based on his documented participation as a referee for jiu-jitsu competitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_01_B2203; source_row=29985 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim as performer
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's athletic acclaim was established but does not automatically transfer to the performing arts field. Evidence of his role in the show was unsubstantiated by independent press coverage or reviews, and his wages, while above average, did not place him among the top earners in the field. The record failed to show he is among the small percentage at the top of the performing arts field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's athletic acclaim was established but does not automatically transfer to the performing arts field. Evidence of his role in the show was unsubstantiated by independent press coverage or reviews, and his wages, while above average, did not place him among the top earners in the field. The record failed to show he is among the small percentage at the top of the performing arts field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-09-14_02_B2203; source_row=29996 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c