Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Bona fide job opportunity available to U.S. workers
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO confirmed that none of the U.S. institutions in the record offer a master's degree in computer applications — all programs found were at the bachelor's or associate level — and independently verified that Boston University does not offer such a program. Because the labor certification permits no alternate degree or field of study, U.S. workers would be unable to satisfy the educational requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO confirmed that none of the U.S. institutions in the record offer a master's degree in computer applications — all programs found were at the bachelor's or associate level — and independently verified that Boston University does not offer such a program. Because the labor certification permits no alternate degree or field of study, U.S. workers would be unable to satisfy the educational requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=29871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted that the labor certification listed Hawaii as the primary worksite while the I-140 petition stated the work would be at the Petitioner's Texas address, creating an inconsistency requiring resolution on remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the labor certification listed Hawaii as the primary worksite while the I-140 petition stated the work would be at the Petitioner's Texas address, creating an inconsistency requiring resolution on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=29872 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD12 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that publication and low citation counts (a maximum of three citations for any one article) did not establish major significance, that the test and software were used at only two institutions, and that their impact appeared limited to a regional language area in India. The Petitioner's argument that research 'should automatically be considered a major contribution' was dismissed as circular.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that publication and low citation counts (a maximum of three citations for any one article) did not establish major significance, that the test and software were used at only two institutions, and that their impact appeared limited to a regional language area in India. The Petitioner's argument that research 'should automatically be considered a major contribution' was dismissed as circular.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=29855 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
ISHA's membership requires only a degree and payment of a fee, neither of which constitutes an outstanding achievement. ASHA's Certificate of Clinical Competence requirements (credential evaluation, clinical fellowship, Praxis exam) were not shown to be outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
ISHA's membership requires only a degree and payment of a fee, neither of which constitutes an outstanding achievement. ASHA's Certificate of Clinical Competence requirements (credential evaluation, clinical fellowship, Praxis exam) were not shown to be outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=29853 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Petitioner had not established the national or international recognition of the award, distinguishing between national availability and national recognition. The letter from the ISHA official called the award 'prestigious' but provided no elaboration or corroborating evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner had not established the national or international recognition of the award, distinguishing between national availability and national recognition. The letter from the ISHA official called the award 'prestigious' but provided no elaboration or corroborating evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=29852 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD12 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the Beneficiary's role at the Indian institute went beyond typical faculty responsibilities but did not rise to 'significant importance' to the outcome of the institution's activities. Additionally, the institution was not shown to have a distinguished reputation, as provisional RCI approval is permission to operate rather than evidence of eminence. The role in U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Beneficiary's role at the Indian institute went beyond typical faculty responsibilities but did not rise to 'significant importance' to the outcome of the institution's activities. Additionally, the institution was not shown to have a distinguished reputation, as provisional RCI approval is permission to operate rather than evidence of eminence. The role in U.S. school districts as a contracted speech pathologist was also not shown to be critical.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=29858 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. Income projections in the business plan lacked corroborating foundation.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. Income projections in the business plan lacked corroborating foundation. The record lacked evidence of concrete steps taken, requisite medical and business licenses, or an explanation of how the Petitioner would simultaneously conduct extensive research, work as a dental hygienist, open a practice, teach dental students, and assist businesses. Reference letters were insufficiently specific and conclusory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B5203; source_row=29861 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was not specifically and consistently defined, making a prong-one determination impossible. Even assuming the change in endeavor was immaterial, the AAO found insufficient evidence of national importance: the expert's economic analysis lacked specific details and her qualifications did not extend to economics; the reference letters did not address national importance; an…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was not specifically and consistently defined, making a prong-one determination impossible. Even assuming the change in endeavor was immaterial, the AAO found insufficient evidence of national importance: the expert's economic analysis lacked specific details and her qualifications did not extend to economics; the reference letters did not address national importance; and the articles discussed the importance of dentistry generally rather than the specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B5203; source_row=29860 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c