Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD12 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=29859 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
original scientific or scholarly research contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Testimonial letters established originality but not major significance in the broader field. New letters and patent evidence submitted on appeal were not considered as new eligibility evidence. Publications and conference presentations alone do not establish significance without corroborating evidence such as high citation rates.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Testimonial letters established originality but not major significance in the broader field. New letters and patent evidence submitted on appeal were not considered as new eligibility evidence. Publications and conference presentations alone do not establish significance without corroborating evidence such as high citation rates. FDA GRAS correspondence and press releases did not demonstrate impact on the overall field beyond the Petitioner's own employer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_02_B5203; source_row=29863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
widespread acclaim and international recognition; position requiring exceptional ability
What the decision said
Because the record did not establish that the Beneficiary met at least two of the seven criteria, AAO expressly reserved the additional requirements of widespread acclaim, international recognition, and that the position requires exceptional ability under 20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1), citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the record did not establish that the Beneficiary met at least two of the seven criteria, AAO expressly reserved the additional requirements of widespread acclaim, international recognition, and that the position requires exceptional ability under 20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1), citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-25_02_B5203; source_row=29864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked bylaws or eligibility requirements demonstrating that association membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The relationship between the black belt rank and formal association membership was unclear.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked bylaws or eligibility requirements demonstrating that association membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The relationship between the black belt rank and formal association membership was unclear.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-24_02_B2203; source_row=29845 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence showed the event was an athletic competition, not an artistic exhibition or showcase. The Petitioner failed to establish that either his participation or the event itself was artistic in nature.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence showed the event was an athletic competition, not an artistic exhibition or showcase. The Petitioner failed to establish that either his participation or the event itself was artistic in nature.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-24_02_B2203; source_row=29848 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence did not establish that the Petitioner held a leadership position for the organization as a whole, rather than for a smaller affiliate segment. Additionally, the record did not demonstrate that the organization or the affiliate academy had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence did not establish that the Petitioner held a leadership position for the organization as a whole, rather than for a smaller affiliate segment. Additionally, the record did not demonstrate that the organization or the affiliate academy had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-24_02_B2203; source_row=29849 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Many articles were not primarily about the Petitioner; the key article omitted the publication source and had a questionable date; and the Petitioner did not establish that any publication qualified as a professional or major trade publication or other major media. Additionally, published material about the Petitioner as a competitor was not within his stated field of endeavor as a coach.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Many articles were not primarily about the Petitioner; the key article omitted the publication source and had a questionable date; and the Petitioner did not establish that any publication qualified as a professional or major trade publication or other major media. Additionally, published material about the Petitioner as a competitor was not within his stated field of endeavor as a coach.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-24_02_B2203; source_row=29846 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics20 papers
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Report Documentation Page does not list the Petitioner as an author and does not demonstrate the work's major significance. Government funding alone does not establish that research has had a major impact on the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Report Documentation Page does not list the Petitioner as an author and does not demonstrate the work's major significance. Government funding alone does not establish that research has had a major impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-08-24_01_B2203; source_row=29842 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c