Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 9981–9990

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The first organization's membership requirements are based on competitive athletic achievement, not school management or instruction. The second letter pertains to the Petitioner's (school's) certification, not the Beneficiary's personal membership, and does not reflect that outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts are required.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The first organization's membership requirements are based on competitive athletic achievement, not school management or instruction. The second letter pertains to the Petitioner's (school's) certification, not the Beneficiary's personal membership, and does not reflect that outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts are required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=29669
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The competitive awards relate to the Beneficiary's prior career as an athlete, not to his area of expertise as a school manager and instructor. The Hall of Fame induction letter references his competitive career and his role as a builder, not achievements in school management or instruction.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The competitive awards relate to the Beneficiary's prior career as an athlete, not to his area of expertise as a school manager and instructor. The Hall of Fame induction letter references his competitive career and his role as a builder, not achievements in school management or instruction.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=29668
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

position requires an advanced degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion. The labor certification plainly lists a bachelor's degree with no experience as the minimum requirement, and no alternate combination of education and experience is acceptable. This does not satisfy the regulatory definition of 'advanced degree.' The Beneficiary's own qualifications are irrelevant because USCIS cannot ignore or alter the labor certification's stated job requirements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion. The labor certification plainly lists a bachelor's degree with no experience as the minimum requirement, and no alternate combination of education and experience is acceptable. This does not satisfy the regulatory definition of 'advanced degree.' The Beneficiary's own qualifications are irrelevant because USCIS cannot ignore or alter the labor certification's stated job requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_02_B5203; source_row=29673
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the petitioner

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director found the published material criterion met and AAO did not disturb that finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director found the published material criterion met and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_01_B2203; source_row=29664
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found on appeal that the Petitioner's membership on the Olympic team satisfied the membership criterion because selection required outstanding achievements as judged by experts based on competition results at the World Championships.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found on appeal that the Petitioner's membership on the Olympic team satisfied the membership criterion because selection required outstanding achievements as judged by experts based on competition results at the World Championships.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_01_B2203; source_row=29663
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Director found the awards criterion met and AAO did not disturb that finding.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director found the awards criterion met and AAO did not disturb that finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_01_B2203; source_row=29662
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other28 papers27 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record reflects that the Petitioner has written several scholarly articles in professional publications in his field.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the Petitioner has written several scholarly articles in professional publications in his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_03_B2203; source_row=29677
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other28 papers27 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner's documented involvement in peer review for scientific journals constitutes participation as a judge of the work of others in the same or allied field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's documented involvement in peer review for scientific journals constitutes participation as a judge of the work of others in the same or allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_03_B2203; source_row=29675
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other28 papers27 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three criteria, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not establish the required level of sustained acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence requirement of three criteria, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not establish the required level of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_03_B2203; source_row=29678
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the Beneficiary satisfied the judging criterion; this was the only criterion found met.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Beneficiary satisfied the judging criterion; this was the only criterion found met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=29671
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment