可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 10031–10040

NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

license or certification

License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting the Director failed to identify what evidence supports the conclusion. The coaching certification letter in the record is not corroborated by evidence that such certification is required to work as a coach in any relevant jurisdiction.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, noting the Director failed to identify what evidence supports the conclusion. The coaching certification letter in the record is not corroborated by evidence that such certification is required to work as a coach in any relevant jurisdiction.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=29619
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

ten years experience

At least 10 years of full-time experience in the occupation

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters in the record establish only part-time coaching (e.g., 8 hours/week), do not specify full-time service, or address playing rather than coaching/management. No letter establishes 10 years of full-time experience in the relevant occupations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters in the record establish only part-time coaching (e.g., 8 hours/week), do not specify full-time service, or address playing rather than coaching/management. No letter establishes 10 years of full-time experience in the relevant occupations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=29618
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters reference the Petitioner's playing achievements and tournament participation, but do not establish that these constitute achievements and significant contributions to the industry as contemplated by the regulation. Key details about competition scope, requirements, and recognition are absent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters reference the Petitioner's playing achievements and tournament participation, but do not establish that these constitute achievements and significant contributions to the industry as contemplated by the regulation. Key details about competition scope, requirements, and recognition are absent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-18_01_B5203; source_row=29622
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aprocedural or other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

procedural or other

Whether attorney's field falls within sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics

证据为何得到认可

AAO determined the Petitioner's practice of international dispute resolution and arbitration law places his area of expertise within the field of business, given his work on arbitration rules, appointment as a CIETAC arbitrator, and articles on comparative arbitration and international investment.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined the Petitioner's practice of international dispute resolution and arbitration law places his area of expertise within the field of business, given his work on arbitration rules, appointment as a CIETAC arbitrator, and articles on comparative arbitration and international investment.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-18_01_B2203; source_row=29616
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

other

Labor certification supports requested immigrant classification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The labor certification requires only a bachelor's degree plus 36 months of experience, which falls short of the advanced degree threshold. The USCIS Policy Manual permits denial without an RFE or NOID when there is no legal basis for approval. Matter of Izummi bars post-denial classification changes as material alterations to the petition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification requires only a bachelor's degree plus 36 months of experience, which falls short of the advanced degree threshold. The USCIS Policy Manual permits denial without an RFE or NOID when there is no legal basis for approval. Matter of Izummi bars post-denial classification changes as material alterations to the petition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-12_02_B5203; source_row=29615
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The certificate was available only to employees of a single institution and the Petitioner did not contest or rebut the Director's conclusion on appeal. An award limited to individuals at a single institution may have little national or international significance.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The certificate was available only to employees of a single institution and the Petitioner did not contest or rebut the Director's conclusion on appeal. An award limited to individuals at a single institution may have little national or international significance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29607
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The April 2020 letter predates the Director's May 2021 denial notice and the letter writer claims no personal knowledge of the Petitioner's judging activity, providing no source for the claimed information.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The April 2020 letter predates the Director's May 2021 denial notice and the letter writer claims no personal knowledge of the Petitioner's judging activity, providing no source for the claimed information.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29609
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The April 2020 letter merely repeated information from earlier letters that the Director had already addressed and found unpersuasive; repeating the information does not rebut the Director's conclusions.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The April 2020 letter merely repeated information from earlier letters that the Director had already addressed and found unpersuasive; repeating the information does not rebut the Director's conclusions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29610
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29611
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=29614
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评