recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the reference letters, news article, photos, and certificates of attendance did not show recognition by peers, governmental entities, or organizations for achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as opposed to to specific employers or clients. Comparable-evidence treatment was unavailable because the Petitioner did not show the standard does not readily apply to his occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the reference letters, news article, photos, and certificates of attendance did not show recognition by peers, governmental entities, or organizations for achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as opposed to to specific employers or clients. Comparable-evidence treatment was unavailable because the Petitioner did not show the standard does not readily apply to his occupation.
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found insufficient evidence of national importance: the Petitioner's skills/experience and client interest related to prong 2; trainings/workshops would not impact the field broadly; and his business projections did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. employment.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found insufficient evidence of national importance: the Petitioner's skills/experience and client interest related to prong 2; trainings/workshops would not impact the field broadly; and his business projections did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. employment.
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner sufficiently documented her own remuneration (disagreeing with the Director's basis for rejecting it), but found she failed to provide relevant comparative wage data from the countries where she worked (Venezuela and India) instead improperly comparing her salary in Swiss francs converted to U.S. dollars against U.S. salary benchmarks.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner sufficiently documented her own remuneration (disagreeing with the Director's basis for rejecting it), but found she failed to provide relevant comparative wage data from the countries where she worked (Venezuela and India) instead improperly comparing her salary in Swiss francs converted to U.S. dollars against U.S. salary benchmarks. Additional evidence submitted on appeal was not considered because the criterion was addressed in the RFE and the Petitioner had the opportunity to respond.
Although the Asia Pacific HRM Congress is an international organization, that alone does not establish that its annual awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. The only information about the award came from the organization's own website, with no independent coverage or evidence of selection criteria demonstrating excellence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Asia Pacific HRM Congress is an international organization, that alone does not establish that its annual awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence. The only information about the award came from the organization's own website, with no independent coverage or evidence of selection criteria demonstrating excellence.
The record establishes that the Petitioner made significant business contributions to her employer, but does not contain sufficient evidence that her work has been widely recognized outside the organization or has already had a demonstrated impact on other organizations or leaders in the field consistent with original contributions of major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record establishes that the Petitioner made significant business contributions to her employer, but does not contain sufficient evidence that her work has been widely recognized outside the organization or has already had a demonstrated impact on other organizations or leaders in the field consistent with original contributions of major significance.