可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 10071–10080

EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

memberships

AAO 为什么未被说服

YPO's membership criteria are primarily quantitative (job title, number of employees, company financials, age) verified by third-party auditors, not by recognized experts in the field. Final decisions are made by local chapter executive committees whose qualifications as recognized national or international experts are not established, and the qualitative factors considered are undefined.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
YPO's membership criteria are primarily quantitative (job title, number of employees, company financials, age) verified by third-party auditors, not by recognized experts in the field. Final decisions are made by local chapter executive committees whose qualifications as recognized national or international experts are not established, and the qualitative factors considered are undefined.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29566
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))

裁决如何说明

AAO flagged that the submission of a membership card alone, without supporting evidence such as membership requirements, may be insufficient to establish that the organization is a professional association. The Director is instructed to assess this on remand.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO flagged that the submission of a membership card alone, without supporting evidence such as membership requirements, may be insufficient to establish that the organization is a professional association. The Director is instructed to assess this on remand.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B5203; source_row=29573
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))

裁决如何说明

AAO identified inconsistencies between the class schedule (showing limited hours) and the revised employer letter (claiming 40 hours per week), and instructed the Director to resolve these on remand and determine whether the petitioner has established ten years of full-time experience as a ballet instructor.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO identified inconsistencies between the class schedule (showing limited hours) and the revised employer letter (claiming 40 hours per week), and instructed the Director to resolve these on remand and determine whether the petitioner has established ten years of full-time experience as a ballet instructor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B5203; source_row=29572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dictum that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dictum that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organization

证据为何得到认可

The AAO found the Director applied the wrong legal standard by requiring industry-wide impact, which is not required for criterion viii. The Petitioner's job title and duties established a leading role, and the submitted media reports and industry awards established the organization's distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the Director applied the wrong legal standard by requiring industry-wide impact, which is not required for criterion viii. The Petitioner's job title and duties established a leading role, and the submitted media reports and industry awards established the organization's distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29569
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner met criterion iii for published material in major media.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner met criterion iii for published material in major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=29567
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the record supported substantial merit given the importance of U.S.-Brazil trade, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show that her specific proposed endeavor had national importance. Her work would not extend beyond her employer and clientele to impact the field broadly, and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects nationally.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the record supported substantial merit given the importance of U.S.-Brazil trade, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show that her specific proposed endeavor had national importance. Her work would not extend beyond her employer and clientele to impact the field broadly, and she did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects nationally.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_03_B5203; source_row=29559
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree or equivalent qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the credential evaluation of little value without an official transcript, noted the diploma contained ambiguous dual graduation dates, and concluded the Director must address whether the Petitioner holds a qualifying advanced degree or five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the credential evaluation of little value without an official transcript, noted the diploma contained ambiguous dual graduation dates, and concluded the Director must address whether the Petitioner holds a qualifying advanced degree or five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience at the time of filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_02_B5203; source_row=29555
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

Neither the Director nor the AAO addressed prong two; only prongs one and three were referenced in the Director's decision.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Neither the Director nor the AAO addressed prong two; only prongs one and three were referenced in the Director's decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_04_B5203; source_row=29563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO withdrew the Director's prong-three finding due to the withdrawal of the threshold EB-2 qualification finding and remanded.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's prong-three finding due to the withdrawal of the threshold EB-2 qualification finding and remanded.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-16_04_B5203; source_row=29564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评