可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 10111–10120

NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学教授

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the third prong unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the third prong unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_01_B5203; source_row=29515
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学教授

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the second prong unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first Dhanasar prong, making analysis of the second prong unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_01_B5203; source_row=29514
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

证据为何得到认可

The Director found this criterion satisfied and AAO did not re-examine it on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found this criterion satisfied and AAO did not re-examine it on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29533
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The Director found this criterion satisfied and the Petitioner did not dispute it on appeal. AAO did not re-examine it.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found this criterion satisfied and the Petitioner did not dispute it on appeal. AAO did not re-examine it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal. Because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, AAO declined to consider new eligibility claims or evidence submitted on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal. Because the Petitioner did not assert eligibility at the initial filing or in response to the RFE, AAO declined to consider new eligibility claims or evidence submitted on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_04_B2203; source_row=29532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration for services

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on remuneration on appeal, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on remuneration on appeal, so AAO considered the issue abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_03_B2203; source_row=29528
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

证据为何得到认可

On motion, newly submitted evidence about the Petitioner's membership on a national team led AAO to conclude this constitutes a qualifying membership, consistent with USCIS Policy Manual guidance that national all-star or Olympic team selection may serve as comparable evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
On motion, newly submitted evidence about the Petitioner's membership on a national team led AAO to conclude this constitutes a qualifying membership, consistent with USCIS Policy Manual guidance that national all-star or Olympic team selection may serve as comparable evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

The Director had granted this criterion, and it was not disturbed on appeal or motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director had granted this criterion, and it was not disturbed on appeal or motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29516
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration for services

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach this criterion formally because three criteria were already satisfied, though AAO's discussion of salary evidence in the coaching context indicated the evidence was unpersuasive.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion formally because three criteria were already satisfied, though AAO's discussion of salary evidence in the coaching context indicated the evidence was unpersuasive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29521
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or major media

证据为何得到认可

New evidence on motion showed www.sport.ua is ranked #10 among sports websites in the relevant country, satisfying the major media requirement for the published-material criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
New evidence on motion showed www.sport.ua is ranked #10 among sports websites in the relevant country, satisfying the major media requirement for the published-material criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-13_02_B2203; source_row=29518
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评