可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 10151–10160

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

裁决如何说明

AAO criticized the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO criticized the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29467
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director failed to analyze evidence under this criterion despite the Petitioner having claimed it, and remanded for the Director's consideration.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director failed to analyze evidence under this criterion despite the Petitioner having claimed it, and remanded for the Director's consideration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29465
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards

裁决如何说明

AAO did not disturb the Director's favorable finding but directed clarification on remand because the Director's analysis cited the wrong criterion and lacked a complete analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's favorable finding but directed clarification on remand because the Director's analysis cited the wrong criterion and lacked a complete analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29463
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

裁决如何说明

AAO faulted the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded for consideration.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO faulted the Director for failing to analyze this claimed criterion and remanded for consideration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29466
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the petitioner

裁决如何说明

AAO criticized the Director for citing no authority for requiring a CV from authors of letters from publication officials, noting the letters were signed, dated, on official letterhead, and certified-translated. AAO directed the Director to reconsider on remand without itself making a final determination.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO criticized the Director for citing no authority for requiring a CV from authors of letters from publication officials, noting the letters were signed, dated, on official letterhead, and certified-translated. AAO directed the Director to reconsider on remand without itself making a final determination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-02_02_B2203; source_row=29464
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that while the Petitioner is an experienced registered nurse providing valuable benefit to her employer and patients, the record does not show her proposed endeavor would impact U.S. healthcare or nursing more broadly. The nursing shortage argument fails because such shortages are directly addressed through the labor certification process and Schedule A designation.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the Petitioner is an experienced registered nurse providing valuable benefit to her employer and patients, the record does not show her proposed endeavor would impact U.S. healthcare or nursing more broadly. The nursing shortage argument fails because such shortages are directly addressed through the labor certification process and Schedule A designation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B5203; source_row=29460
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in major media

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's determination that this criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted that many articles lacked sufficient independent evidence to establish the publications as major media.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's determination that this criterion was satisfied, though AAO noted that many articles lacked sufficient independent evidence to establish the publications as major media.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B2203; source_row=29457
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's awards were mostly received many years before filing, her media coverage did not set her apart from others in the field, her commercial success lacked evidence of personal recognition, and her single judging instance did not reflect a career of acclaimed work. Taken together, the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of her field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's awards were mostly received many years before filing, her media coverage did not set her apart from others in the field, her commercial success lacked evidence of personal recognition, and her single judging instance did not reflect a career of acclaimed work. Taken together, the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the very top of her field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-06-01_01_B2203; source_row=29459
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the limited media coverage of the awards insufficient to establish national or international recognition, noting inconsistencies in information about the award organization, lack of media coverage of the specific ceremonies where the Petitioner received his awards, and unclear selection criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the limited media coverage of the awards insufficient to establish national or international recognition, noting inconsistencies in information about the award organization, lack of media coverage of the specific ceremonies where the Petitioner received his awards, and unclear selection criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-05-31_01_B2203; source_row=29440
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish that print publications are major media (no circulation data or rankings provided), and that screenshots and producer summaries of television appearances do not satisfy the requirement for published material with transcripts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to establish that print publications are major media (no circulation data or rankings provided), and that screenshots and producer summaries of television appearances do not satisfy the requirement for published material with transcripts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2022-05-31_01_B2203; source_row=29441
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评