The Petitioner submitted a diploma and certificate of completion granting the professional title of Data Processing Technician from a business school, satisfying the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted a diploma and certificate of completion granting the professional title of Data Processing Technician from a business school, satisfying the criterion.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters of reference praised the Petitioner's work on behalf of his employer and clients but did not provide specific examples of recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters of reference praised the Petitioner's work on behalf of his employer and clients but did not provide specific examples of recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.
At least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation sought
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO disagreed with Petitioner's argument that requiring duty descriptions was an elevated standard, affirming that the experience must be in the specific occupation sought (education administration). The employment letters describing executive positions without sufficient detail did not demonstrate full-time experience in education administration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with Petitioner's argument that requiring duty descriptions was an elevated standard, affirming that the experience must be in the specific occupation sought (education administration). The employment letters describing executive positions without sufficient detail did not demonstrate full-time experience in education administration.
All submitted documents were already in the record and introduced no new facts. The Petitioner's unsupported assertion that he submitted a timely brief was insufficient without a copy of the brief or proof of mailing, and even if accepted, would still not demonstrate that the appeal identified specific legal or factual errors as required.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
All submitted documents were already in the record and introduced no new facts. The Petitioner's unsupported assertion that he submitted a timely brief was insufficient without a copy of the brief or proof of mailing, and even if accepted, would still not demonstrate that the appeal identified specific legal or factual errors as required.