lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to evaluate this criterion due to the Director's failure to analyze the evidence, and remanded for the Director to focus analysis on the two awards claimed in the RFE response.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to evaluate this criterion due to the Director's failure to analyze the evidence, and remanded for the Director to focus analysis on the two awards claimed in the RFE response.
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field
裁决如何说明
AAO noted that the Director's discussion in the 'Conclusion' section appeared to relate to this criterion but was inadequate because it did not address specific evidence; AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the Director's discussion in the 'Conclusion' section appeared to relate to this criterion but was inadequate because it did not address specific evidence; AAO remanded for a proper analysis.
substantial prospective benefit to the United States
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the Director's analysis flawed because it sought evidence already provided and ignored a relevant reference letter. Because the term 'substantially benefit' is interpreted broadly and the Petitioner provided a detailed plan and supporting evidence, AAO found this requirement met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis flawed because it sought evidence already provided and ignored a relevant reference letter. Because the term 'substantially benefit' is interpreted broadly and the Petitioner provided a detailed plan and supporting evidence, AAO found this requirement met.
AAO does not reach prong one because the threshold EB-2 issue and the question of what the proposed endeavor actually is must first be resolved on remand.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not reach prong one because the threshold EB-2 issue and the question of what the proposed endeavor actually is must first be resolved on remand.
AAO withdrew the Director's threshold finding, identifying inconsistencies the Petitioner must resolve: the three-year length of the Licenciado program conflicts with EDGE's equivalency, and the evaluator failed to review employment letters as required.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's threshold finding, identifying inconsistencies the Petitioner must resolve: the three-year length of the Licenciado program conflicts with EDGE's equivalency, and the evaluator failed to review employment letters as required.
Entrepreneurs are not listed in section 101(a)(32) of the Act among occupations qualifying as professions, and the Petitioner did not establish that a U.S. baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement for his occupation. Merely identifying a general field is insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Entrepreneurs are not listed in section 101(a)(32) of the Act among occupations qualifying as professions, and the Petitioner did not establish that a U.S. baccalaureate degree is the minimum entry requirement for his occupation. Merely identifying a general field is insufficient.