AAO found that the Beneficiary's peer review activity (5 papers), publication record (7 documents over 6 years), unsupported citation claims, roles, and salary — considered in totality — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of mathematical research.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's peer review activity (5 papers), publication record (7 documents over 6 years), unsupported citation claims, roles, and salary — considered in totality — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of mathematical research.
The submitted membership card did not bear the Petitioner's name and there was no evidence that the National Wood Carvers Association is a professional organization within the regulatory definition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted membership card did not bear the Petitioner's name and there was no evidence that the National Wood Carvers Association is a professional organization within the regulatory definition.
ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted an Employment Record Book rather than employer letters, and the AAO found that this neither qualifies as employer letters nor establishes ten years of full-time experience as a woodcarver.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted an Employment Record Book rather than employer letters, and the AAO found that this neither qualifies as employer letters nor establishes ten years of full-time experience as a woodcarver.