Because the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor and did not provide consistent information about it, AAO could not determine whether she was well positioned to advance the endeavor.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner materially changed her proposed endeavor and did not provide consistent information about it, AAO could not determine whether she was well positioned to advance the endeavor.
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed the focus and field of her proposed endeavor between the petition filing and the RFE response, and that post-filing changes (forming a company and planning to pursue a doctoral degree) cannot retroactively establish eligibility. The inconsistency in the description of the proposed endeavor prevented AAO from evaluating whether it had substantial merit and national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner materially changed the focus and field of her proposed endeavor between the petition filing and the RFE response, and that post-filing changes (forming a company and planning to pursue a doctoral degree) cannot retroactively establish eligibility. The inconsistency in the description of the proposed endeavor prevented AAO from evaluating whether it had substantial merit and national importance.
AAO finds the record does not establish a foreign equivalent bachelor's degree because the transferred-credits issue is unresolved on the transcript and the credentials evaluation may not have considered the transfer. The employment letters lack job-duty information needed to assess whether experience was progressive, and there are material inconsistencies with the Form ETA-750B.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the record does not establish a foreign equivalent bachelor's degree because the transferred-credits issue is unresolved on the transcript and the credentials evaluation may not have considered the transfer. The employment letters lack job-duty information needed to assess whether experience was progressive, and there are material inconsistencies with the Form ETA-750B.
AAO agrees the Petitioner did not show national importance: the prospective impact does not extend beyond her future employer(s) and clients to affect the financial industry or U.S. interests more broadly, and she has not shown significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the Petitioner did not show national importance: the prospective impact does not extend beyond her future employer(s) and clients to affect the financial industry or U.S. interests more broadly, and she has not shown significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
AAO does not separately analyze the second prong, having agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusion that the first prong was not met and remanding the EB-2 threshold issue.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not separately analyze the second prong, having agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusion that the first prong was not met and remanding the EB-2 threshold issue.
Commanded a salary or other remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The salary printout was undated, the timeframes were ambiguous, and the Petitioner's 2016 tax income was actually below the reported average for a fully performing supply chain coordinator. Even accepting the 2014–2015 paystubs showing above-average earnings, the evidence did not establish that his salary was attributable to his exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The salary printout was undated, the timeframes were ambiguous, and the Petitioner's 2016 tax income was actually below the reported average for a fully performing supply chain coordinator. Even accepting the 2014–2015 paystubs showing above-average earnings, the evidence did not establish that his salary was attributable to his exceptional ability.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the translation of the academic documents was not properly certified for Portuguese, neither equivalency evaluation was reliable, and the AACRAO EDGE database did not confirm the equivalency of the specific credential. While experience letters were sufficient, the underlying foreign degree's U.S. equivalency was not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the translation of the academic documents was not properly certified for Portuguese, neither equivalency evaluation was reliable, and the AACRAO EDGE database did not confirm the equivalency of the specific credential. While experience letters were sufficient, the underlying foreign degree's U.S. equivalency was not established.
The Petitioner did not explain how the same registration serves as both a license and a professional membership, nor did he provide background information on the organization, its membership requirements, or what registration confers.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not explain how the same registration serves as both a license and a professional membership, nor did he provide background information on the organization, its membership requirements, or what registration confers.
At least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters in aggregate did not persuasively establish ten years of full-time experience; some positions (e.g., supply chain coordinator, trainee engineer) did not clearly relate to the sought occupation; and three letters signed by the same HR coordinator for three different companies raised authenticity and authority concerns.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters in aggregate did not persuasively establish ten years of full-time experience; some positions (e.g., supply chain coordinator, trainee engineer) did not clearly relate to the sought occupation; and three letters signed by the same HR coordinator for three different companies raised authenticity and authority concerns.